Posts: 23,429
Threads: 132
Joined: Jun 2009
Bummer. But as bottom of the snake pick, not like I'm going to have to even make a decision until tomorrow evening anyway.
Current games (All): RtR: PB80 Civ 6: PBEM23
Ended games (Selection): BTS games: PB1, PB3, PBEM2, PBEM4, PBEM5B, PBEM50. RB mod games: PB5, PB15, PB27, PB37, PB42, PB46, PB71. FFH games: PBEMVII, PBEMXII. Civ 6: PBEM22 Games ded lurked: PB18
Posts: 17,850
Threads: 162
Joined: May 2011
(August 22nd, 2013, 13:33)Krill Wrote: Bummer. But as bottom of the snake pick, not like I'm going to have to even make a decision until tomorrow evening anyway. FTFY
August 22nd, 2013, 13:43
(This post was last modified: August 22nd, 2013, 13:47 by Krill.)
Posts: 23,429
Threads: 132
Joined: Jun 2009
Current games (All): RtR: PB80 Civ 6: PBEM23
Ended games (Selection): BTS games: PB1, PB3, PBEM2, PBEM4, PBEM5B, PBEM50. RB mod games: PB5, PB15, PB27, PB37, PB42, PB46, PB71. FFH games: PBEMVII, PBEMXII. Civ 6: PBEM22 Games ded lurked: PB18
Posts: 6,075
Threads: 36
Joined: Jul 2010
With 7 players and only 8 civs/8 leaders currently on the list (unless ofc the list got a bit larger when I wasn't looking) do we want to add another leader/civ or two to increase choice?
fnord
Posts: 23,429
Threads: 132
Joined: Jun 2009
Well, with the snake pick order posted we can't actually change the leader/civs available without unanimous agreement. (Which was my fault for not being explicit on when it should be posted).
That said, there was a reason I suggested adding 2 leader/civs to the choice so that last pick had 1 out of 3, but hey shit happens. I'm last pick so I'm the one that gets the choice of what UU to cram down someone's throats.
Current games (All): RtR: PB80 Civ 6: PBEM23
Ended games (Selection): BTS games: PB1, PB3, PBEM2, PBEM4, PBEM5B, PBEM50. RB mod games: PB5, PB15, PB27, PB37, PB42, PB46, PB71. FFH games: PBEMVII, PBEMXII. Civ 6: PBEM22 Games ded lurked: PB18
Posts: 6,075
Threads: 36
Joined: Jul 2010
I haven't actually opened Mardoc's spoiler, so I've no idea what our current pick order is.
It just happened that I was adding up the number of players in the game and the number of options available and thinking that a bit more flexibility might be good.
If this results in any kind of silly forum drama then I'll withdraw the suggestion
or grab a bucket of popcorn. . 
fnord
August 22nd, 2013, 16:10
(This post was last modified: August 22nd, 2013, 16:11 by Krill.)
Posts: 23,429
Threads: 132
Joined: Jun 2009
Quote:There were 7 items in your list. Here they are in random order:
Scooter
Serdoa
Pindicator
novice
Commodore
Thoth
Krill
Timestamp: 2013-08-21 00:59:27 UTC
Current games (All): RtR: PB80 Civ 6: PBEM23
Ended games (Selection): BTS games: PB1, PB3, PBEM2, PBEM4, PBEM5B, PBEM50. RB mod games: PB5, PB15, PB27, PB37, PB42, PB46, PB71. FFH games: PBEMVII, PBEMXII. Civ 6: PBEM22 Games ded lurked: PB18
Posts: 13,563
Threads: 49
Joined: Oct 2009
I'm like, you know, whatever.
That said, I think adding more civs and leaders is fine. I would also be fine with a larger map, as suggested by Commodore, although IIUC it's a little late for that.
I have to run.
Posts: 17,436
Threads: 78
Joined: Nov 2005
Also ok with adding more civs & leaders
Suffer Game Sicko
Dodo Tier Player
Posts: 6,075
Threads: 36
Joined: Jul 2010
(August 22nd, 2013, 16:10)Krill Wrote: Quote:There were 7 items in your list. Here they are in random order:
Scooter
Serdoa
Pindicator
novice
Commodore
Thoth
Krill
Timestamp: 2013-08-21 00:59:27 UTC
Ah.
So I'm no longer unbiased.
I'll abstain from any voting and go with the will of the rest of the players. I did sign up for a "dregs" PBEM after all. 
fnord
|
![[Image: fuckitigettopickaciv.jpg]](https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/24745121/fuckitigettopickaciv.jpg)
