Are you, in fact, a pregnant lady who lives in the apartment next door to Superdeath's parents? - Commodore
Create an account  
Realms Beyond Forum     Gaming     The Gaming Table     Werewolf Archives     Signups for AITP 3 - The Return of the Dead Guys

 
Signups for AITP 3 - The Return of the Dead Guys

#31
January 22nd, 2013, 17:27
Tasunke Offline
Hippus Mercenary
Posts: 4,421
Threads: 53
Joined: Sep 2011
lol
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oVfUJkYqMOU
Find
Reply

#32
January 23rd, 2013, 06:34
Ichabod Offline
Member
Posts: 9,706
Threads: 69
Joined: Dec 2010
Why not use the rule of whoever reached the final number of votes first gets lynched?
Find
Reply

#33
January 23rd, 2013, 06:59
Tasunke Offline
Hippus Mercenary
Posts: 4,421
Threads: 53
Joined: Sep 2011
Hmm. Shouldnt it be the first person to reach the lynch tally that has lynch priority? AKA, the challenger has to one up him?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oVfUJkYqMOU
Find
Reply

#34
January 23rd, 2013, 07:25
zakalwe Offline
Colin
Posts: 7,902
Threads: 13
Joined: Aug 2006
(January 23rd, 2013, 06:34)Ichabod Wrote: Why not use the rule of whoever reached the final number of votes first gets lynched?

Yeah, that works.
If you know what I mean.
Find
Reply

#35
January 23rd, 2013, 09:26
Tasunke Offline
Hippus Mercenary
Posts: 4,421
Threads: 53
Joined: Sep 2011
Ah, I misread it. Yea ... final tally of votes first. (as in, first to get to it ...)

So if X gets 7 votes, then reduces to 5 and Y gets 7, then if X gets 7 again, X is lynched. (assuming both now tied at 7)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oVfUJkYqMOU
Find
Reply

#36
January 23rd, 2013, 11:08
NobleHelium Offline
Terse Lurker. Competence First.
Posts: 13,233
Threads: 25
Joined: Oct 2010
I'm pretty sure everyone was thinking Y would get lynched in that case.
Civilization IV: 21 (Bismarck of Mali), 29 (Mao Zedong of Babylon), 38 (Isabella of China), 45 (Victoria of Sumeria), PB12 (Darius of Sumeria), 56 (Hammurabi of Sumeria), PB16 (Bismarck of Mali), 78 (Augustus of Byzantium), PB56 (Willem of China)
Hearthstone: ArenaDrafts Profile No longer playing Hearthstone. wink
Find
Reply

#37
January 23rd, 2013, 11:17 (This post was last modified: January 23rd, 2013, 11:18 by Tasunke.)
Tasunke Offline
Hippus Mercenary
Posts: 4,421
Threads: 53
Joined: Sep 2011
Ah. I think that is a horrible idea.

I mean hell, last minute switches are bad enough. lol
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oVfUJkYqMOU
Find
Reply

#38
January 23rd, 2013, 14:01
uberfish Offline
Werewolf Hunter
Posts: 4,471
Threads: 65
Joined: Feb 2006
(January 23rd, 2013, 06:34)Ichabod Wrote: Why not use the rule of whoever reached the final number of votes first gets lynched?

It's doable in a small game like AITP but I would NEVER use that in any game I run because, in reality, I make enough votecount errors that it'd be worse than random.
Find
Reply

#39
January 23rd, 2013, 14:56 (This post was last modified: January 23rd, 2013, 15:14 by BRickAstley.)
BRickAstley Offline
Administrator
Posts: 7,916
Threads: 158
Joined: Jan 2012
We could always just run Hammer vote system. Day ends when a candidate reaches half of the total votes. Then you never have to worry about tie breaking.

hammer
Find
Reply

#40
January 23rd, 2013, 15:09
Tasunke Offline
Hippus Mercenary
Posts: 4,421
Threads: 53
Joined: Sep 2011
ah yes ... vote counts in absentia, et al. I can see how a rule like this would be terribly hard to host. ^_^
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oVfUJkYqMOU
Find
Reply



Forum Jump: