October 12th, 2020, 08:25
Posts: 7,602
Threads: 75
Joined: Jan 2018
The wording isn't clear about that. My intention was to just affect trade routes, not access to resources.
But what I noticed on closer inspection. Does the city still have a road connection? It looks like there is none anymore?
October 12th, 2020, 08:34
Posts: 8,786
Threads: 40
Joined: Aug 2012
I'd assume trade routes include commerce and resource trades - otherwise you can't stop someone gifting iron, etc with a blockade.
I should probably go to the CtH thread and argue that the RtR implementation (stopping tile use and trade but only over a 9-tile area) is easier to understand and less powerful.
Completed: RB Demogame - Gillette, PBEM46, Pitboss 13, Pitboss 18, Pitboss 30, Pitboss 31, Pitboss 38, Pitboss 42, Pitboss 46, Pitboss 52 (Pindicator's game), Pitboss 57
In progress: Rimworld
October 12th, 2020, 09:09
Posts: 15,381
Threads: 112
Joined: Apr 2007
That's unfortunate. I mean, it's better than vanilla BtS, but just barely.
Turn is played. If TBS does backstab me like it seems he plans to for no apparent reason instead of taking absolutely free Dutch cities and getting himself back into the game, I probably concede. He's not the type to blindly kingmake, but it sure looks like he plans to, so whatever. Maybe he gets a look at the situation and changes his mind, who knows.
October 12th, 2020, 11:07
(This post was last modified: October 12th, 2020, 11:07 by NobleHelium.)
Posts: 13,216
Threads: 25
Joined: Oct 2010
Trade routes and resource trading/connection are intricately connected, stopping one stops the other. And I don't think they should be decoupled either.
If you don't like it then I could see going with the RtR implementation instead.
October 12th, 2020, 15:17
Posts: 6,472
Threads: 63
Joined: Sep 2006
Noble, a blockade of a coastal with a road connection to another non-blockaded city on the same landmass will still get resources, right?
October 12th, 2020, 15:38
(This post was last modified: October 12th, 2020, 15:46 by Charriu.)
Posts: 7,602
Threads: 75
Joined: Jan 2018
(October 12th, 2020, 15:17)sunrise089 Wrote: Noble, a blockade of a coastal with a road connection to another non-blockaded city on the same landmass will still get resources, right?
I just tested that.
As you can see Angkor Thom, Angkor Wat and Yasodharapura are all under a blockade by the enemy privateer.
Angkor Thom still had access to the corn, because it has a road connection to that resource. It does not have any other resources, because it does only have coastal trade connections with the other cities. This also means that the other cities don't have access to corn in that example.
Angkor Wat has no access to any resources, because it only has coastal trade connections and the clam is under the blockade. It can still work the clam tile.
Yasodharapura has still access to copper, pigs, gold, gems and the fish. Because it still has a access to all resources via road and the fish is not blockaded.
Nagara Jayasari and the southern city all have access to the same resources as Yasodharapura.
EDIT: Also if I move the privateer down so that it only blockades the southern city, then that city will still receive the corn from Angkor Thom, which is connected to the southern city via coastal from Angkor Thom to Yasodharapura and from there via road to the southern city.
This all sounds very logical to me.
EDIT2: Even with the RtR implementation the result for this specific city of scooters would be the same with regard to access to resources.
October 12th, 2020, 15:54
(This post was last modified: October 12th, 2020, 16:00 by NobleHelium.)
Posts: 13,216
Threads: 25
Joined: Oct 2010
Yes, blockades do not affect land trade connections. This is all well and fine and I don't see a need to change this.
As for scooter not getting Astronomy and his galleon, that's under #fuckpitboss.
October 12th, 2020, 17:19
Posts: 6,472
Threads: 63
Joined: Sep 2006
Thanks Charriu. This would fall under ‘works as intended’ for me then.
October 12th, 2020, 18:16
Posts: 15,381
Threads: 112
Joined: Apr 2007
I concede to Commodore. TBS declared and moved everything in against Bigfoot. Nice kingmaking TBS, very cool! If you want out of the game that bad, ask for a replacement.
That should be the game, right?
October 12th, 2020, 18:22
Posts: 15,381
Threads: 112
Joined: Apr 2007
Here's the state of things.
Chemtrails will survive this upcoming turn. He doesn't have enough yet. Maybe he has more coming.
These two stacks constitute almost literally every single unit Cornflakes has left. This is understandable, but also never would happen because he has an angry neighbor in the other direction, right?
Instead of taking advantage of this to capture completely undefended Dutch cities from THE PLAYER WHO RUINED HIS GAME REPEATEDLY he's going to dogpile on me, the person who SINGLE-HANDEDLY KEPT HIS CIV ALIVE in order to what, capture a city Commodore will just take from him later? Okay man.
Commodore will join in 3T, and he will have a swath of lightly defended cities to take because I've shifted everything in this direction. Neither of these guys have any chance at winning, so it's GG. I'll play out one more turn so Cornflakes gets the satisfaction of capturing something, and then I'll peace out.
|