Shoot's offer seemed pretty fair to me, though. It's not like "plako" is going to win him the game, and alienating the guy with Infantry seems like maybe a bad idea.
[SPOILERS] PBEM17 Lurker thread
|
Lurker ethics situation... Darrell's gotten the benefit of my advice on the best tech path to space. (It's not necessarily perfect, but is borne from a fair amount of experience.) Novice may not have seen it... is it fairer to give Novice the same advice or fairer not to speak up?
T-hawk Wrote:Lurker ethics situation... Darrell's gotten the benefit of my advice on the best tech path to space. (It's not necessarily perfect, but is borne from a fair amount of experience.) Novice may not have seen it... is it fairer to give Novice the same advice or fairer not to speak up? I tend to think it's fairer not to speak up. Darrell got your advice in response to a direct question. Novice hasn't asked. If he does ask, then answer him.
EitB 25 - Perpentach
Occasional mapmaker T-hawk Wrote:Lurker ethics situation... Darrell's gotten the benefit of my advice on the best tech path to space. (It's not necessarily perfect, but is borne from a fair amount of experience.) Novice may not have seen it... is it fairer to give Novice the same advice or fairer not to speak up? In this particular case I don't think it would be fair to tell novice. If you would have explained it to Darrell in his thread after he asked for it I think it would be needed to be told to novice as well to stay fair. But Darrell simply uses an internet-source (which happens to be an old post by you). Thats something novice can use as well if he bothers to search for it.
novice has already mentioned the T-hawk manifesto (post 1049 for example) so it's rather irrelevant. I think it's fine to mention it if he's talking about the subject, but I wouldn't bring it up out of the blue.
Civilization IV: 21 (Bismarck of Mali), 29 (Mao Zedong of Babylon), 38 (Isabella of China), 45 (Victoria of Sumeria), PB12 (Darius of Sumeria), 56 (Hammurabi of Sumeria), PB16 (Bismarck of Mali), 78 (Augustus of Byzantium), PB56 (Willem of China)
Hearthstone: ArenaDrafts Profile No longer playing Hearthstone. Quote:novice has already mentioned the T-hawk manifesto (post 1049 for example) so it's rather irrelevant. I think it's fine to mention it if he's talking about the subject, but I wouldn't bring it up out of the blue.You see i am right.
20 turns until Dave gets his golden age, and then another 6 before he swaps to war civics? The game is going to be over by then...
Civilization IV: 21 (Bismarck of Mali), 29 (Mao Zedong of Babylon), 38 (Isabella of China), 45 (Victoria of Sumeria), PB12 (Darius of Sumeria), 56 (Hammurabi of Sumeria), PB16 (Bismarck of Mali), 78 (Augustus of Byzantium), PB56 (Willem of China)
Hearthstone: ArenaDrafts Profile No longer playing Hearthstone.
So am I reading this right that darrell is freaking out about losing 3GD and nospace isn't even building it?
Basically, yeah.
Civilization IV: 21 (Bismarck of Mali), 29 (Mao Zedong of Babylon), 38 (Isabella of China), 45 (Victoria of Sumeria), PB12 (Darius of Sumeria), 56 (Hammurabi of Sumeria), PB16 (Bismarck of Mali), 78 (Augustus of Byzantium), PB56 (Willem of China)
Hearthstone: ArenaDrafts Profile No longer playing Hearthstone. |