Posts: 8,022
Threads: 37
Joined: Jan 2006
I just want to say its incredibly annoying how Mikehendi moves his units over like 8 logins. Whether its legal or not, it shouldn't be. Move all your units, end turn. Simple. The idea of a turn timer is so everyone has time to play their turn, not so that everyone can play their turn over 549 phases over the 24 hours.
I have not ever not moved all my units in one login phase.
I've got some dirt on my shoulder, can you brush it off for me?
Posts: 5,455
Threads: 18
Joined: Jul 2011
Maybe a polite telling-off in the tech thread is in order. Bantams doesn't seem too confident of his position from my sifting through the despondency in the tech thread. I'm sure that will somehow not be helpful to our position.
Posts: 13,217
Threads: 25
Joined: Oct 2010
Well, you can blame the lack of a report on Mike for sure.
Posts: 3,771
Threads: 26
Joined: Sep 2010
(March 3rd, 2014, 22:26)Boldly Going Nowhere Wrote: Maybe a polite telling-off in the tech thread is in order. Bantams doesn't seem too confident of his position from my sifting through the despondency in the tech thread. I'm sure that will somehow not be helpful to our position.
The only response to your new avatar is "Make it so!".
Oh, and thanks for reminding me of Captain's Holiday. Now I have to go find the bleach and pour it down my ear.
Travelling on a mote of dust, suspended in a sunbeam.
Posts: 13,217
Threads: 25
Joined: Oct 2010
@ICHABOD
I don't see how Bantams could have double moved Gavagai. Bantams is first in turn order and he did not log in after Gavagai logged in on the last two turns.
Posts: 9,706
Threads: 69
Joined: Dec 2010
I'm not going into details, Noble, but Bantams did make illegal moves against Gavagai.
March 4th, 2014, 20:54
(This post was last modified: March 4th, 2014, 20:55 by NobleHelium.)
Posts: 13,217
Threads: 25
Joined: Oct 2010
Okay. I just want to be sure that it actually happened.
I did notice that Bantams whipped after ending turn two turns previous, but it was before Gavagai logged in so I don't think that's a problem or a double move.
Posts: 5,455
Threads: 18
Joined: Jul 2011
(March 4th, 2014, 17:44)Brian Shanahan Wrote: (March 3rd, 2014, 22:26)Boldly Going Nowhere Wrote: Maybe a polite telling-off in the tech thread is in order. Bantams doesn't seem too confident of his position from my sifting through the despondency in the tech thread. I'm sure that will somehow not be helpful to our position.
The only response to your new avatar is "Make it so!".
Oh, and thanks for reminding me of Captain's Holiday. Now I have to go find the bleach and pour it down my ear.
 
(March 4th, 2014, 20:22)Gavagai Wrote: (March 4th, 2014, 20:11)SevenSpirits Wrote: I have limited knowledge, but I suspect that the AI would play marginally better than bantams. (Also, plenty of human players will move units out of cities when it's a really bad idea, too.)
Oh, if you only knew...
Also, I just want to note that perceived skill level of a Persian player was a serious factor in my decisions. If I knew that he would be subbed I may have played differently.
I have zero sympathy for this line of thinking. I think I'll make a super risky play because I hope that my opponent is as bad as I think he is. But, I don't want to take any risk in case things go off the rails and he quits when I start the roflostomp. 
(March 4th, 2014, 21:05)Dhalphir Wrote: what about if we replace both gavagai AND bantams with AI? that would be the most fair outcome i believe
While we're at it, let's replace some of our missing inferior food resources.  BTW, I think I need that beating a dead horse smiley, where is it?
Posts: 7,658
Threads: 31
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 13,217
Threads: 25
Joined: Oct 2010
Oh and it seems we never mentioned this, but we did indeed revolt into Police motherfuckin' State about 30 turns ago.
|
![[Image: deadhorse.gif]](https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/44346970/gifs/deadhorse.gif)