Hm ok, here's what confusing me right now. Basically, given the apparent mirroring, it would be logical that each player has their own little "parition" like this. However, from my scouting it's apparent that everyone has their own southern partition rather than my north/south split guess. I think the most accurate way would be to state everyone has their own "column." So, I know the following info:
1) There are 884 land tiles
2) Starting from the apparent "mirror" or division or whatever on my northeast side, I can count west 10 tiles. It could be a couple more - not sure - but I can at least count 10. So let's guess the width of each column is 10, for a total map width of 40. Reasonable number I think.
3) Starting from the furthest south tile I can see to the furthest north is 21 tiles. I can also see enough bleedthrough to know there's at least 1 more on both north and south, so minimum of 23 rows of tiles exist on this map for sure.
So let's round 23 up to 25 for ease of use. It seems highly unlikely to me (got a few reasons for it) that this map is anything shorter than 25 rows. So 25X40 is a fairly conservative stab at map dimensions. However, 25 * 40 => 1,000 tiles exactly. So... something's off here with my theory, and I'm not sure exactly what it is. 116 tiles "do not exist." I'll know more once I head southeast and figure out where/if there's a "mirror" on this next section (I'm pretty sure at this point if I head south I'll run into land a lot like my west side). Mist also mentioned that he's mastered the quick mirroring by editing WBSaves in a text editor for the duels, so it wouldn't shock me if he did something similar here.
But yeah, clearly I've made a mistake somewhere. I asked the peak question because the peaks would solve everything if they didn't count as land - because that would explain why a hundred or so tiles aren't accounted for. Now, water tiles would also explain it, but we've seen no sign of those anywhere. Only place it could be is further north, but that would imply only like 1-2 columns of habitable land up there which would be really bizarre so I'm not betting on that either. Much more likely that it's really good land, otherwise nobody will go north and it'll just be a 5 cities and then kill-fest, which decidedly favors me. Hm. Yeah, not sure what to think here. Hopefully tomorrow's turns will give me enough info to piece the rest of this together. Does all of this make sense or would some screenshots help demonstrate?
1) There are 884 land tiles
2) Starting from the apparent "mirror" or division or whatever on my northeast side, I can count west 10 tiles. It could be a couple more - not sure - but I can at least count 10. So let's guess the width of each column is 10, for a total map width of 40. Reasonable number I think.
3) Starting from the furthest south tile I can see to the furthest north is 21 tiles. I can also see enough bleedthrough to know there's at least 1 more on both north and south, so minimum of 23 rows of tiles exist on this map for sure.
So let's round 23 up to 25 for ease of use. It seems highly unlikely to me (got a few reasons for it) that this map is anything shorter than 25 rows. So 25X40 is a fairly conservative stab at map dimensions. However, 25 * 40 => 1,000 tiles exactly. So... something's off here with my theory, and I'm not sure exactly what it is. 116 tiles "do not exist." I'll know more once I head southeast and figure out where/if there's a "mirror" on this next section (I'm pretty sure at this point if I head south I'll run into land a lot like my west side). Mist also mentioned that he's mastered the quick mirroring by editing WBSaves in a text editor for the duels, so it wouldn't shock me if he did something similar here.
But yeah, clearly I've made a mistake somewhere. I asked the peak question because the peaks would solve everything if they didn't count as land - because that would explain why a hundred or so tiles aren't accounted for. Now, water tiles would also explain it, but we've seen no sign of those anywhere. Only place it could be is further north, but that would imply only like 1-2 columns of habitable land up there which would be really bizarre so I'm not betting on that either. Much more likely that it's really good land, otherwise nobody will go north and it'll just be a 5 cities and then kill-fest, which decidedly favors me. Hm. Yeah, not sure what to think here. Hopefully tomorrow's turns will give me enough info to piece the rest of this together. Does all of this make sense or would some screenshots help demonstrate?