Cool.
"You have been struck down!" - Tales of Dwarf Fortress
---
"moby_harmless seeks thee not. It is thou, thou, that madly seekest him!"
---
"moby_harmless seeks thee not. It is thou, thou, that madly seekest him!"
Are you, in fact, a pregnant lady who lives in the apartment next door to Superdeath's parents? - Commodore |
Diplomacy Master Thread- Helping Your Opponents Beat Themselves
|
Cool.
"You have been struck down!" - Tales of Dwarf Fortress
--- "moby_harmless seeks thee not. It is thou, thou, that madly seekest him!" (November 26th, 2012, 16:49)scooter Wrote: So does the German team seem caught unawares? Hopefully for your sake they are easy to defeat. Do you think you can take a lot from them? Not sure about "Hopefully for your sake" - maybe "Hopefully for the turn-timer's sake" or "Hopefully they will leave some more cities empty for you."?
Completed: RB Demogame - Gillette, PBEM46, Pitboss 13, Pitboss 18, Pitboss 30, Pitboss 31, Pitboss 38, Pitboss 42, Pitboss 46, Pitboss 52 (Pindicator's game), Pitboss 57
In progress: Rimworld
Ok, so kalin's suggestion seemed nice and simple, so I went with that:
RB to WPC Wrote:Tatu, Also sent the draft to the German team as-is without mention of the city raze. That can come up naturally in follow-up messages, the message to them was less important. Here it is: RB to GWT Wrote:Flunky, Also sent a quick thank you note back to CFC about their OB message: RB Wrote:Caledorn/CFC,
Also, I have updated the 2nd post of the tracking thread to reflect the deals we have recently signed.
Just realized something: have we at all considered agreements to limit EP spending to the point where both teams have graphs? It'd be a good way to build trust, avoid spy missions against us, allow us to focus EP on teams we actually want to spend it on, and/or find out if a team is planning to use espionage missions against us. Maybe a topic to bring up with CFC for instance, as we don't seem all that set on attacking them and could probably use our EP in better places than against them.
CFC are going to be putting EPs on us anyway. The moment they pop a GSpy, warn them off. If they move in, we ramp out defensive EP spending and start guarding own cities and running countermissions.
I see absolutely no reason not to suggest/request an EP spending limit agreement with CFC. What kind of attitude is "they're going to be spending EPs on us anyway, we shouldn't bother trying to head them off"?
Civilization IV: 21 (Bismarck of Mali), 29 (Mao Zedong of Babylon), 38 (Isabella of China), 45 (Victoria of Sumeria), PB12 (Darius of Sumeria), 56 (Hammurabi of Sumeria), PB16 (Bismarck of Mali), 78 (Augustus of Byzantium), PB56 (Willem of China)
Hearthstone: ArenaDrafts Profile No longer playing Hearthstone. |