January 20th, 2013, 04:14
(This post was last modified: January 20th, 2013, 04:15 by Fintourist.)
Posts: 2,996
Threads: 7
Joined: Apr 2012
Value-adding comment:
I kind of like Eastern Dealers..
Btw, our GNP lead against weakest rivals is starting to get brutal. I assume that our main rivals have GNP values ranging from 100 to 128.
January 20th, 2013, 04:20
Posts: 13,563
Threads: 49
Joined: Oct 2009
(January 20th, 2013, 03:56)Sian Wrote: limit is 18 as far as i remember
It's actually 15, not that this is critically important or anything.
I have to run.
January 20th, 2013, 05:15
Posts: 12,335
Threads: 46
Joined: Jan 2011
(January 20th, 2013, 04:20)novice Wrote: (January 20th, 2013, 03:56)Sian Wrote: limit is 18 as far as i remember
It's actually 15, not that this is critically important or anything.
The sanctity of our naming scheme shall not be diminished!
“The wind went mute and the trees in the forest stood still. It was time for the last tale.”
January 20th, 2013, 07:59
(This post was last modified: January 20th, 2013, 08:00 by NobleHelium.)
Posts: 13,214
Threads: 25
Joined: Oct 2010
I prefer Eastern Dealers. No need to announce to the world that there are gems there.
By the way I'm not sure we should be working the plains forest in FP. We could give the plains cottage to FP and work that and then work a priest turn in MM instead (burning 1f).
January 20th, 2013, 08:03
Posts: 1,834
Threads: 34
Joined: Feb 2006
(January 20th, 2013, 07:59)NobleHelium Wrote: I prefer Eastern Dealers. No need to announce to the world that there are gems there.
Or we can simply name it EGD
"We are open to all opinions as long as they are the same as ours."
January 20th, 2013, 10:32
Posts: 4,831
Threads: 12
Joined: Jul 2010
(January 20th, 2013, 08:03)Dantski Wrote: Or we can simply name it EGD
Horrible. "Eastern Dealers" for the win. No reason to telegraph resources unnecessarily.
January 20th, 2013, 10:35
Posts: 6,664
Threads: 246
Joined: Aug 2004
OK, in terms of more serious things up for discussion:
* Still no consensus on where to move the CFC scout next turn.
* We still have a new worker sitting in Mansa's Muse unmoved. If anyone wants to offer an alternate plan for that worker, now is the time.
I'm always interested to see what does and what does not attract a lot of conversation from the team.
January 20th, 2013, 10:41
Posts: 4,831
Threads: 12
Joined: Jul 2010
I support moving toward CivPlayers this turn. Slow-rolling diplo for a turn is likely to be less of a diplo hit than clock shenanigans as a first impression.
I trust you and the microteam on Mansa's worker.
January 20th, 2013, 12:01
Posts: 5,455
Threads: 18
Joined: Jul 2011
(January 20th, 2013, 10:41)Ceiliazul Wrote: I support moving toward CivPlayers this turn. Slow-rolling diplo for a turn is likely to be less of a diplo hit than clock shenanigans as a first impression.
I trust you and the microteam on Mansa's worker.
Agree all the way around. Let's not mess around with the clock. I like mh's notion of moving early on the city diagonal. Proactive > reactive. I'm also ok with the current micro on Mansa's worker.
January 20th, 2013, 12:01
Posts: 13,563
Threads: 49
Joined: Oct 2009
I assume there's a micro plan for the worker which takes precedence, IMO. In a vacuum, I'd suggest mining one of FP's hills.
Scout should ignore the barb city.
But most importantly, Alemanni should be renamed to Eastern Dealers.
I have to run.
|