I was curious about how CFC acted when they told us about planning to settle at the oasis spot. This seems to be the post where they told us:
To me this seems like them telling us they're going to settle. They even mentioned that it'd be a pretty aggressive settle, and while they were nice enough to tell us ahead of time, there was no "is this settling spot okay with you guys?", it was a "this is what we're doing, hope you're okay with it", with a dash of making sure we knew that they weren't going to be anymore aggressive than that. For me then, Pink dot is perfectly fine, and I don't really see how they'd have a leg to stand on if they got up in arms about it. I don't see how they could get angry at us for doing exactly what they told us they'd do.
(November 20th, 2012, 00:26)Lord Parkin Wrote: Received from CFC:
Quote:Hi Scooter / RB,
...
Regarding our border agreement ideas, we will be settling a city that is around this area very soon, which is why we wanted to open up discussions again. This city will have the Oasis in the BFC. We respect this halfway-point landmark, however, so this is as far West as we will settle.
Caledorn for Team CFC
To me this seems like them telling us they're going to settle. They even mentioned that it'd be a pretty aggressive settle, and while they were nice enough to tell us ahead of time, there was no "is this settling spot okay with you guys?", it was a "this is what we're doing, hope you're okay with it", with a dash of making sure we knew that they weren't going to be anymore aggressive than that. For me then, Pink dot is perfectly fine, and I don't really see how they'd have a leg to stand on if they got up in arms about it. I don't see how they could get angry at us for doing exactly what they told us they'd do.