Btw, I'm not sure if we are really planning to send the same text, but there is a risk that it would come across as mocking them and cause aggression. It would be safer to send practically the same content but reword the text. However, I would find it extremely amusing if we would send the same text and leave the changes visible (like in Bloodly's previous post)
Dot mapping
|
I don't think we're actually planning to do that. But I think we could definitely send something very similar to it.
Civilization IV: 21 (Bismarck of Mali), 29 (Mao Zedong of Babylon), 38 (Isabella of China), 45 (Victoria of Sumeria), PB12 (Darius of Sumeria), 56 (Hammurabi of Sumeria), PB16 (Bismarck of Mali), 78 (Augustus of Byzantium), PB56 (Willem of China)
Hearthstone: ArenaDrafts Profile No longer playing Hearthstone.
Yeah, as much as the idea is amusing, I wouldn't do that.
Maybe we need a spam thread called "Honest Diplo Messages" or something. All the things we could have sent... (January 24th, 2013, 14:43)scooter Wrote: Maybe we need a spam thread called "Honest Diplo Messages" or something. All the things we could have sent... Hello _____: We want to be your friends until our conquest for world domination begins. kthxbi, RB
Completed: SG2-Wonders or Else!; SG3-Monarch Can't Hold Me; WW3-Surviving Wolf; PBEM3-Replacement for Timmy of Khmer; PBEM11-Screwed Up Huayna Capac of Zulu; PBEM19-GES, Roland & Friends (Mansa of Egypt); SG4-Immortality Scares Me
We like you so much that we intend to eat you first, when the stars are right.
Sincerely, The Great Old Team
Furthermore, I consider that forum views should be fluid in width
Apologies for our sudden but inevitable betrayal.
On second thought, no apologies.
We don't stop playing because we grow old; we grow old because we stop playing. - George Bernard Shaw
Dear CivPlayers,
Thanks for not renaming your cities to a naming scheme of your chosing. In that way, it will be much less heartbreaking when we rename them for you. -RB
--
Best dating advice on RB: When you can't hide your unit, go in fast and hard. -- Sullla
With the FP spot unavailable, we need to either find a good place to put a city, or determine really quickly to make some changes to our micro plan.
(South)western spots currently look unappealing as there are no more resources to claim. I am running out the door, but what are our options?
Options are like, novice's northeast jungle city, semi-crappy wheat/flood plain city east of ST, a double dry rice massive jungle city in the northwest...or planting in CivPlayers's face 3E of their annoyingly-placed city. Some people think that's crucial for supporting BB, I don't really agree. That's about it I think.
Civilization IV: 21 (Bismarck of Mali), 29 (Mao Zedong of Babylon), 38 (Isabella of China), 45 (Victoria of Sumeria), PB12 (Darius of Sumeria), 56 (Hammurabi of Sumeria), PB16 (Bismarck of Mali), 78 (Augustus of Byzantium), PB56 (Willem of China)
Hearthstone: ArenaDrafts Profile No longer playing Hearthstone.
The main argument for the hill plant city on the lake 3E of that annoying Aztec city is to anchor the defense and secure our interior from possibly being boated later on. I see little to no economic value to a city there at this time, but I don't feel comfortable leaving BbB dangling isolated by itself across the lake. It would take a very good NAP agreement and built up diplomatic trust to make me feel confident about leaving BbB hanging by itself.
|