WW20: Legend of the Undercity

[novice]

To add more info , If he gets lynched one of his guilty voters will die due to guilt at night.

A Jester is possible, we've never had one on RB though. It's considered a bastard (i.e. Unnfun and/or Unfair) role. I don't know how it would be classified with the added ability above - sounds overpowered and unfair to scum.

[novice]

But nobody should have a role that encourages them to be lynched.

Uber said we could have a possessed.

[zakalwe]

But nobody should have a role that encourages them to be lynched.

Uber said we could have a possessed.

Hmmm. Ok. I don't think the possessed would play to get lynched on day one, though.

[Jkaen]

Ichabod getting himself lynched on purpose. Can't see why else his defence is so bad

[zakalwe]

Ichabod getting himself lynched on purpose. Can't see why else his defence is so bad

Ok. I wouldn't say it's THAT bad, but it certainly feels half hearted. Flug isn't exactly putting up much of a fight, either.

[BRickAstley]

Besides Gazglum, I'd be interested in voting BRick off. He's playing too neutral, but making sure to appear active. Most of his early posts concentrated on picking apart so far built cases, for not having enough evidence behind them. Pressing people for reasons for their early votes, when at this point there's much of nothing to accuse people of (starting posts and roleplaying in general). It's day 1, there is rarely any evidence, just lots of gut feelings, random votes or applying pressure. I understand when you start to ask for reasons at this point, but he did it way too early.

When you look at the posts where he actually suspects someone, it's these two:
http://realmsbeyond.net/forums/showthrea...#pid336644
http://realmsbeyond.net/forums/showthrea...#pid336856

Again too neutral and safe IMO. I think he's a wolf just riding safely through the day 1.

Eh, I can see your point. I've not been able to get a good confident read on someone, so I've been mainly looking for if anyone else is making good solid arguments, and saying when I think someone doesn't have a solid argument. I think a lot of that is last game (Game of Thrones Edition), I was too eager to find and build a case to help out the village, and it ended up catching me a lot of flak and getting Vigged night one, because it was too overeager and didn't have a solid basis. So I definitely want to help, but I'm being cautious, and I'm not going to throw together any crackpot theories until I get one I'm super sure of. Give me a little time. :P

Those two posts you posted were short yes, but the first one was a "Let's just get Bigger talking" one, which he did, and the Ichabod one was done on my way out the door cause I didn't know if I would be back in time. Plus it helps that the case had also been well laid out against him, there's no point on me writing up a big post about Ichabod's chance to be scum when it's already been done.

[Ryan]

Possessed what does he do? take over someone?

[BRickAstley]

And yes, that's why I'm staying on Ichabod right now. He knows he's in trouble, but hasn't offered forth any defense. Who is it that you're waiting on BTW Ichabod?

[Jkaen]

Possessed is a villager who wins if the scum do

[Gaspar]

Nobody else for Bigger? Only other thing I can think of to say to convince is I get the sense that he's playing this angry sort of game which seems exactly like his scum game last time. He made a comment about not liking the RB metagame that I didn't like. I always feel like the lashing out at things you can't control is a frustrated scumtell. Just a collection of little things, I guess. I really think he's a better option than flug, who I'd like to see post at least once before we lynch him and Ichabod, who I sort of feel like must be driving at something, he's not even trying to save himself, really.