RBP8 IT and Tech Issues Thread

[Commodore]

I'll hop in and pause, no worries, Bigger said he'd probably need it.

[CFCJesterFool]

I'll hop in and pause, no worries, Bigger said he'd probably need it.

Don't pause because of us...I got that handled. Pausing for Bigger is fine.

[Bigger]

so what happenned, was there a pause? I see us, scooter, and 3 amigos still need to play. just want to confirm the turn was paused before I log in and take care of it.

[Krill]

Yes it was paused, but if you could leave it paused after you end turn it would be greatly appreciated.

[Bigger]

Yes it was paused, but if you could leave it paused after you end turn it would be greatly appreciated.

yeah I can wait for confirmation from scooter and cfcjester to unpause. I'll take a little bit to play anyway, since we're not just waiting on me .

[CFCJesterFool]

I ended turn...thank Krill for his persuasion.

Now on to my rant...
Sequential turns DOESN'T REQUIRE double movement rules. In fact, they are counter productive...by the house rules, I already got notified I would be attacked (by PM). So f****** stupid. It is IMPOSSIBLE to double move with sequential turns.Seriously, this rule has no place in a sequential turn game. Just my opinion ofc but I didn't get to Deity without knowing the rules of the game. Wtf, "you have to end the turn cause I'm going to attack and I don't want to double move"...really, stupid rule with no purpose.

The rules are what they are (this game anyway) but a re-visit of the sequential game rules would be welcome. The double move rule should be axed imo (because it makes no sense).

[Bigger]

I ended turn...thank Krill for his persuasion.

Now on to my rant...
Sequential turns DOESN'T REQUIRE double movement rules. In fact, they are counter productive...by the house rules, I already got notified I would be attacked (by PM). So f****** stupid. It is IMPOSSIBLE to double move with sequential turns.Seriously, this rule has no place in a sequential turn game. Just my opinion ofc but I didn't get to Deity without knowing the rules of the game. Wtf, "you have to end the turn cause I'm going to attack and I don't want to double move"...really, stupid rule with no purpose.

The rules are what they are (this game anyway) but a re-visit of the sequential game rules would be welcome. The double move rule should be axed imo (because it makes no sense).

umm, the problem is - we aren't playing a sequential game. we have played turns really quick in this simultaneous game, but it would be just about impossible to play an 11 team game in sequential.

[spacetyrantxenu]

We're playing simultaneous turns, not sequential, which is why a double move agreement (as in, to not do it) is absolutely required. For why it is necessary go read PB7 and the clusterfuck that became. Not avoiding double moves is the way to the dark side, avoid it at all costs.

[spacetyrantxenu]

Xposted with bigger, my phone is slow I was going to mention game speed on seq turns but it takes too long to type on this thing.

[CFCJesterFool]

I ended turn...thank Krill for his persuasion.

Now on to my rant...
Sequential turns DOESN'T REQUIRE double movement rules. In fact, they are counter productive...by the house rules, I already got notified I would be attacked (by PM). So f****** stupid. It is IMPOSSIBLE to double move with sequential turns.Seriously, this rule has no place in a sequential turn game. Just my opinion ofc but I didn't get to Deity without knowing the rules of the game. Wtf, "you have to end the turn cause I'm going to attack and I don't want to double move"...really, stupid rule with no purpose.

The rules are what they are (this game anyway) but a re-visit of the sequential game rules would be welcome. The double move rule should be axed imo (because it makes no sense).

umm, the problem is - we aren't playing a sequential game. we have played turns really quick in this simultaneous game, but it would be just about impossible to play an 11 team game in sequential.

Wrong word, I meant simultaneous...Sorry I am pretty drunk and I do get confused on words. Anyway, except for the wrong terminology, I stand by my words. Thanks for the correction.