It was a mistake, I can link directly to the micro plan:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?...kdWc#gid=1
Eastern Dealers, T102 and T103. As written, we work pigs + gems on both turns, gain 6 food each turn, and grow to size 3 at eot 103. When I went to play the turns out in-game, this proved to be impossible, since pigs + gems only produces +5 food surplus, and only then did I realize that we should have connected the clams right away. Seven has done a fabulous job here, I'm not criticizing him in any way about the management at this city. What I am asking is for you guys to give me the benefit of the doubt on this issue; this is one case where the mistake was in the plan itself, not in my execution of it.
Now on the issue of sending our missionary to Gourmet Menu instead of Starfall: I don't agree with this. Sending the missionary to Gourmet Menu, it will arrive on T105 instead of the T108 as currently planned. Those three turns will allow us to produce 2, 2, and 1 more production via Organized Religion, for 5 extra production in total, as I have it currently written. In turn, this causes Starfall to expand borders several turns later by not having religion in the city; I have a forest chop completing a work boat on the turn that religion pops the city's borders in the current plan. Starfall only has three good tiles: the corn, the fish, and the oasis; maybe the stone counts as a fourth good tile, but it's not really all that great. The fish is located in the second ring, and all of the choppable forests are in that second ring as well. I value getting the borders popped sooner, and that fish connected faster, more than getting slightly more OR production in Gourmet Menu. Faster border pop also lets us connect that second stone resource faster, which could be useful for our deals with CFC.
More importantly, however, is that the whole micro plan was written under the assumption of that missionary going to Starfall. It might even be better to send the missionary to Gourmet Menu instead; I'm honestly not sure. But everything has been written with the Starfall plan in mind. Is it worthwhile to go through and spend a couple of hours rewriting our plan for a very minimal gain in optimization? Perhaps, but I won't be the one to do it. We all talked about how important it was to have some kind of micro plan in place, and no one was willing to do the actual grunt work of putting it together. I did - I spent five hours putting it together yesterday. I'm not perfect, and I have no doubt things could be further optimized off of what I came up with. However, if no one is willing to put in that time and effort, then yes, you ARE going to have to live with some of my choices, because the city builds and worker actions are all contingent on one another. That's why we plan in the first place, so that we can coordinate things down the road and have a larger strategy.
Long story short, the potential gains from spreading religion in Gourmet Menu over Starfall are not worth the effort of redoing the worker and city planning. If you feel differently, here's the spreadsheet. Have at it.
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?...kdWc#gid=1
Eastern Dealers, T102 and T103. As written, we work pigs + gems on both turns, gain 6 food each turn, and grow to size 3 at eot 103. When I went to play the turns out in-game, this proved to be impossible, since pigs + gems only produces +5 food surplus, and only then did I realize that we should have connected the clams right away. Seven has done a fabulous job here, I'm not criticizing him in any way about the management at this city. What I am asking is for you guys to give me the benefit of the doubt on this issue; this is one case where the mistake was in the plan itself, not in my execution of it.
Now on the issue of sending our missionary to Gourmet Menu instead of Starfall: I don't agree with this. Sending the missionary to Gourmet Menu, it will arrive on T105 instead of the T108 as currently planned. Those three turns will allow us to produce 2, 2, and 1 more production via Organized Religion, for 5 extra production in total, as I have it currently written. In turn, this causes Starfall to expand borders several turns later by not having religion in the city; I have a forest chop completing a work boat on the turn that religion pops the city's borders in the current plan. Starfall only has three good tiles: the corn, the fish, and the oasis; maybe the stone counts as a fourth good tile, but it's not really all that great. The fish is located in the second ring, and all of the choppable forests are in that second ring as well. I value getting the borders popped sooner, and that fish connected faster, more than getting slightly more OR production in Gourmet Menu. Faster border pop also lets us connect that second stone resource faster, which could be useful for our deals with CFC.
More importantly, however, is that the whole micro plan was written under the assumption of that missionary going to Starfall. It might even be better to send the missionary to Gourmet Menu instead; I'm honestly not sure. But everything has been written with the Starfall plan in mind. Is it worthwhile to go through and spend a couple of hours rewriting our plan for a very minimal gain in optimization? Perhaps, but I won't be the one to do it. We all talked about how important it was to have some kind of micro plan in place, and no one was willing to do the actual grunt work of putting it together. I did - I spent five hours putting it together yesterday. I'm not perfect, and I have no doubt things could be further optimized off of what I came up with. However, if no one is willing to put in that time and effort, then yes, you ARE going to have to live with some of my choices, because the city builds and worker actions are all contingent on one another. That's why we plan in the first place, so that we can coordinate things down the road and have a larger strategy.
Long story short, the potential gains from spreading religion in Gourmet Menu over Starfall are not worth the effort of redoing the worker and city planning. If you feel differently, here's the spreadsheet. Have at it.