Posts: 13,214
Threads: 25
Joined: Oct 2010
In other news, I didn't realize that NTB means that you can't trade techs that you got from a hut. Makes perfect sense of course, if you look at the rule as "only being able to trade techs that you researched yourself."
Posts: 7,766
Threads: 94
Joined: Oct 2009
(March 5th, 2013, 18:42)NobleHelium Wrote: Thanks for the assistance everyone! 
Glad to help. Btw AT thanked me in his thread, I would correct him but I didn't want to give him unnecessary information about how many people it took to accomplish this. 
March 5th, 2013, 19:01
(This post was last modified: March 5th, 2013, 19:04 by NobleHelium.)
Posts: 13,214
Threads: 25
Joined: Oct 2010
Yeah I saw that, it doesn't matter.
Looks like Jowy elected to play and forego any choice of attacking. Would have been funny if AT had ended up being unable to defend after all.
Posts: 13,214
Threads: 25
Joined: Oct 2010
Lewwyn...that post was totally obvious but also totally inappropriate.
Posts: 12,335
Threads: 46
Joined: Jan 2011
(March 8th, 2013, 23:12)NobleHelium Wrote: Lewwyn...that post was totally obvious but also totally inappropriate.
You mean you think its a spoiler? Because I thought about it for a second and decided that if I was dedlurking, this is exactly what I'd be saying no matter what. I agree that it could be construed as a spoiler but look at what I quoted. Cornflakes specifically asked "Question:" and I responded in my own way... I also did not reference anything that Cornflakes and Q did not know themselves.
So yeah I thought about it before I hit reply and decided it was okay. Do you disagree?
“The wind went mute and the trees in the forest stood still. It was time for the last tale.”
Posts: 13,214
Threads: 25
Joined: Oct 2010
Yes, I don't think you should have said that since you've read the other threads. It's totally obvious and I would say the same thing as a dedlurker, but that's my general rule of thumb, not to advise on decision-making that hinges on judgment of opponents.
Posts: 7,658
Threads: 31
Joined: Jun 2011
It was still a nice post, even if inappropriate. I give it 5 eggs, would read again.
Posts: 13,214
Threads: 25
Joined: Oct 2010
Disclaimer: my statement earlier is not exhaustive. There are other situations where I would avoid commenting even if they don't involve judgment of opponents.
Posts: 12,335
Threads: 46
Joined: Jan 2011
(March 8th, 2013, 23:23)NobleHelium Wrote: Yes, I don't think you should have said that since you've read the other threads. It's totally obvious and I would say the same thing as a dedlurker, but that's my general rule of thumb, not to advise on decision-making that hinges on judgment of opponents.
Well, I could post and say that this simply my opinion or delete the post altogether. But I wonder if that might be more suspicious. I get where you're coming from, but really don't think its spoilery.
“The wind went mute and the trees in the forest stood still. It was time for the last tale.”
Posts: 13,214
Threads: 25
Joined: Oct 2010
Yeah whatever it's already been posted. I don't think there's much to be done at this point.
|
