Well, this game has been quite entertaining. Couple of main events:
1. Azza destroys his game with two unsuccessful Keshik rushes
2. Serdoa and Old Harry run away with their economies compared to Azza and Hydra
3. Serdoa focuses on production and builds by far the largest military
4. Serdoa captures couple of Old Harry's cities (including Pyramids), but goes a step too far and the war ends with both players crippled.
5. Hydra finds himself on the top spot of all the main demos.
6? Hydra will attack Serdoa with a stack of knights and I have no clue who will end up winning this game.
(March 20th, 2013, 00:15)NobleHelium Wrote: Well there's a difference between a fair treaty and a treaty your opponent is willing to accept. The value of not being at war may be equal to or greater than the difference between those two things.
I'm not suggesting that 200g plus a city would be fair. I'm saying that almost any player would accept that rather than lose two cities and still be at war.
I guess they share a border (NW of Serdoa/SE of Hydra), but I believe that Hydra wants to surprise Serdoa by attacking from an unexpected direction? Maybe? But yeah, stealing the Pyramids from weakened Old Harry or taking Azza out would have been probably more straight-forward targets. Well
