I don't get why they wouldnt keep that city.
Please don't go. The drones need you. They look up to you.
Are you, in fact, a pregnant lady who lives in the apartment next door to Superdeath's parents? - Commodore |
The Dark arts - C&D Master Thread
|
I don't get why they wouldnt keep that city.
Please don't go. The drones need you. They look up to you.
Am I reading Civstats right that the Spanish let their capital starve as the turn rolled? Spite!
Played: Pitboss 18 - Kublai Khan of Germany Somalia | Pitboss 11 - De Gaulle of Byzantium | Pitboss 8 - Churchill of Portugal | PB7 - Mao of Native America | PBEM29 Greens - Mao of Babylon
Are we sure that the city was actually razed? Just because it is not on the map does not mean it was razed. Cities have to be re-explored after being captured.
Civilization IV: 21 (Bismarck of Mali), 29 (Mao Zedong of Babylon), 38 (Isabella of China), 45 (Victoria of Sumeria), PB12 (Darius of Sumeria), 56 (Hammurabi of Sumeria), PB16 (Bismarck of Mali), 78 (Augustus of Byzantium), PB56 (Willem of China)
Hearthstone: ArenaDrafts Profile No longer playing Hearthstone. (June 19th, 2013, 22:00)NobleHelium Wrote: Are we sure that the city was actually razed? Just because it is not on the map does not mean it was razed. Cities have to be re-explored after being captured. Chinook was razed because CivStats showed CivFr had a score increase, Boa a score decrease, and then CivFr a score decrease to its earlier score increase, all with the same timestamp. I haven't checked the in-game diplo screen, but that's pretty conclusive to me.
Furthermore, I consider that forum views should be fluid in width
Sure, that is.
Civilization IV: 21 (Bismarck of Mali), 29 (Mao Zedong of Babylon), 38 (Isabella of China), 45 (Victoria of Sumeria), PB12 (Darius of Sumeria), 56 (Hammurabi of Sumeria), PB16 (Bismarck of Mali), 78 (Augustus of Byzantium), PB56 (Willem of China)
Hearthstone: ArenaDrafts Profile No longer playing Hearthstone. (June 19th, 2013, 19:14)spacetyrantxenu Wrote: Am I reading Civstats right that the Spanish let their capital starve as the turn rolled? Spite!Perhaps they were pillaged or all their tiles are being covered by enemy units? Or maybe they are working max hammers to get out one final unit? Who knows? "There is no wealth like knowledge. No poverty like ignorance." (June 20th, 2013, 10:13)Speaker Wrote:(June 19th, 2013, 19:14)spacetyrantxenu Wrote: Am I reading Civstats right that the Spanish let their capital starve as the turn rolled? Spite!Perhaps they were pillaged or all their tiles are being covered by enemy units? Or maybe they are working max hammers to get out one final unit? Who knows? Or whipping multiple units in the queue on the same turn. You can still dry whip a scout at size 2. Wonder if the Spanish know this...
I don't think the Spanish team starved their city. The score loss isn't enough for losing a pop point - it's only -1. I guess it's some beladed adjustment of their land score.
We got new maps from them, though, and we now have vision of the following cities: Apolyton: Gaziantep CivFr: all cities but Gwin Gwen (!) CivPlayers: Malinalco and Tamuin CFC: all former Spanish cities (Bulawayo, KwaDukuza, Umgungundlovu, Nobamba) Univers: Epsilum
Furthermore, I consider that forum views should be fluid in width
|