Thanks for the visual Sullla. That helps a lot
Suffer Game Sicko
Dodo Tier Player
Dodo Tier Player
Are you, in fact, a pregnant lady who lives in the apartment next door to Superdeath's parents? - Commodore |
Diplomacy Master Thread- Helping Your Opponents Beat Themselves
|
I am finding myself more and more swayed by the arguments from Sullla and novice. That is I am leaning on taking all cities and moving on, then come T200 take even a few more cities if we can from WPC.
Kalin
Minor correction on Sulla's post, Huron River is only at 20% culture as can be seen in this screenshot. Plus WPC is teching Monarchy, so we know how close they are to Feudalism, I guess.
I don't expect any difficulty taking control of the marble tile and the associated desert tiles. IMPORTANT NOTICE: it is now turn 160 which is the first turn that the NAP with CivPlayers can be put into cooldown for cancellation. Do we want to talk to them, possibly activate the cooldown or threaten to activate the cooldown, given what we said about a pre-emptive strike on them if they do not agree to a longer NAP?
Civilization IV: 21 (Bismarck of Mali), 29 (Mao Zedong of Babylon), 38 (Isabella of China), 45 (Victoria of Sumeria), PB12 (Darius of Sumeria), 56 (Hammurabi of Sumeria), PB16 (Bismarck of Mali), 78 (Augustus of Byzantium), PB56 (Willem of China)
Hearthstone: ArenaDrafts Profile No longer playing Hearthstone. (July 11th, 2013, 19:02)NobleHelium Wrote: IMPORTANT NOTICE: it is now turn 160 which is the first turn that the NAP with CivPlayers can be put into cooldown for cancellation. Do we want to talk to them, possibly activate the cooldown or threaten to activate the cooldown, given what we said about a pre-emptive strike on them if they do not agree to a longer NAP? Apolyton NAP ends that turn too, so it might be best to wait until T162 or something if we will cancel.
Completed: SG2-Wonders or Else!; SG3-Monarch Can't Hold Me; WW3-Surviving Wolf; PBEM3-Replacement for Timmy of Khmer; PBEM11-Screwed Up Huayna Capac of Zulu; PBEM19-GES, Roland & Friends (Mansa of Egypt); SG4-Immortality Scares Me
I don't feel good about essentially making the threat and then not following through, but I think it would be perfectly understandable for us to tell CP that we're actually deciding against cancelling the NAP as planned, since we think there's no way CFC will be prepared for a war on turn 175, and we're not actually interested in conquering them, just in self-defense.
Gives reasoning as to why we're backing away from our threat that isn't "we'd lose", and might shake their faith in a CFC turn 175 attack. (July 11th, 2013, 18:39)kalin Wrote: I am finding myself more and more swayed by the arguments from Sullla and novice. That is I am leaning on taking all cities and moving on. Not going to comment on the T200 side of things, but I'm convinced. Let's go kill the Germans and take their stuff. WPC will be fortunate if they don't lose anything.
I'm going to throw up a poll. I'm curious what everyone actually feels like doing.
In Soviet Russia, Civilization Micros You!
"Right, as the world goes, is only in question between equals in power, while the strong do what they can and the weak suffer what they must." “I have never understood why it is "greed" to want to keep the money you have earned but not greed to want to take somebody else's money.” |