October 14th, 2009, 10:03
Posts: 6,490
Threads: 63
Joined: Sep 2006
Olodune Wrote:From a lurkers perspective I would certainly prefer a game without duplicate leaders or civs .... just sayin'
I would also be happy to put together a map, or check over the work of someone else.
Great - we have a whole map committee (Krill, Ruff, Olodune, and Mostly_Harmless IIRC).
Polls 4 and 5 are effectively over as well. Poll 4 is 5-2 in favor of Restricted Leaders. Poll 5 has 5 votes for No Duplicates. Since the votes for the other choices in Poll 5 are already split, so other choice will be able to muster enough votes to tie. Therefore Poll 5 can be closed with No Duplicates as the winner.
October 14th, 2009, 10:07
Posts: 23,620
Threads: 134
Joined: Jun 2009
(don;t move the goalposts)
Also, just an idle comment, it's a little weird to see 2 polls that depend on each other done separately.
Current games (All): RtR: PB83
Ended games (Selection): BTS games: PB1, PB3, PBEM2, PBEM4, PBEM5B, PBEM50. RB mod games: PB5, PB15, PB27, PB37, PB42, PB46, PB71 PB80. FFH games: PBEMVII, PBEMXII. Civ 6: PBEM22 PBEM23Games ded lurked: PB18
October 14th, 2009, 10:15
Posts: 6,671
Threads: 246
Joined: Aug 2004
Since the Restricted/Unrestricted leaders is the only point under real discussion right now, we could have all of the teams submit a new vote on that, with the understanding that we've already agreed on no duplicates. Would that work for everyone?
At the moment, Speaker and I have no real preference on this issue.
October 14th, 2009, 10:21
Posts: 232
Threads: 3
Joined: Jul 2009
Agree with Krill, I found it hard to put anything down for those that could be considered an informed choice, as I don't really know what to put without knowing how we'd pick for each outcome...
October 14th, 2009, 11:10
Posts: 493
Threads: 11
Joined: Aug 2007
Sullla Wrote:Since the Restricted/Unrestricted leaders is the only point under real discussion right now, we could have all of the teams submit a new vote on that, with the understanding that we've already agreed on no duplicates. Would that work for everyone?
At the moment, Speaker and I have no real preference on this issue.
Sulla, we already voted on this two times and you want to vote one more time??? 
Most people who vote for restricted leaders voted also for no duplicates, so they knew what they were voting for. I don't see any reason to submit a new vote on this.
October 14th, 2009, 11:14
Posts: 2,090
Threads: 31
Joined: Apr 2004
Mortius Wrote:Sulla, we already voted on this two times and you want to vote one more time???
Most people who vote for restricted leaders voted also for no duplicates, so they knew what they were voting for. I don't see any reason to submit a new vote on this. In the time it took you to make this post, you could have just voted again. :P
"There is no wealth like knowledge. No poverty like ignorance."
October 14th, 2009, 11:17
Posts: 1,927
Threads: 16
Joined: May 2008
Sullla Wrote:Since the Restricted/Unrestricted leaders is the only point under real discussion right now, we could have all of the teams submit a new vote on that, with the understanding that we've already agreed on no duplicates. Would that work for everyone?
At the moment, Speaker and I have no real preference on this issue.
I'd have to agree with Sulla on this contrary to Mortius. Krill makes a good point as the 2 are very reliant on each other and without knowing the outcome of one makes it difficult to vote on the other. LiPing as pointed this out as well.
October 14th, 2009, 11:20
Posts: 1,927
Threads: 16
Joined: May 2008
Speaker Wrote:In the time it took you to make this post, you could have just voted again. :P
Well then, maybe I'll get it started :-).
Since we're going no duplicates then I'd have to go with unrestricted!
October 14th, 2009, 11:25
Posts: 1,834
Threads: 34
Joined: Feb 2006
restricted still
"We are open to all opinions as long as they are the same as ours."
October 14th, 2009, 11:36
Posts: 879
Threads: 3
Joined: Jul 2008
|
