As a French person I feel like it's my duty to explain strikes to you. - AdrienIer

Create an account  

 
Pitboss 18 Organizing Thread (RB Mod 34 Civs)

IIRC you can't actually trade resources and stuff unless you have a peace deal?
Current games (All): RtR: PB80 Civ 6: PBEM23

Ended games (Selection): BTS games: PB1, PB3, PBEM2, PBEM4, PBEM5B, PBEM50. RB mod games: PB5, PB15, PB27, PB37, PB42, PB46, PB71. FFH games: PBEMVII, PBEMXII. Civ 6:  PBEM22 Games ded lurked: PB18
Reply

I favor banning all city gifting
Reply

(March 2nd, 2014, 13:07)plako Wrote: I favor banning all city gifting

+1. Simple rules are better - no loopholes.
Reply

But what about city sales?
Current games (All): RtR: PB80 Civ 6: PBEM23

Ended games (Selection): BTS games: PB1, PB3, PBEM2, PBEM4, PBEM5B, PBEM50. RB mod games: PB5, PB15, PB27, PB37, PB42, PB46, PB71. FFH games: PBEMVII, PBEMXII. Civ 6:  PBEM22 Games ded lurked: PB18
Reply

I can't make up my mind. Ban would remove both the grey area trades, but also reasonable ones.
Finished:
PBEM 45G, PB 13, PB 18, PB 38 & PB 49

Top 3 favorite turns: 
#1, #2, #3
Reply

Agree with Plako's Points.

I hope that we can get an extension on the reroll deadline until we know which version of RBmod will be used. It looks like there may be changes from 2.0.3.9 to 2.0.4.x which haven't been detailed or otherwise incorporated into the changelog. I don't think the map is ready, anyway, so it shouldn't be a delay.
Reply

Re banning city deals: It would change the dynamics of ending a war quite much. Do we want it?
Finished:
PBEM 45G, PB 13, PB 18, PB 38 & PB 49

Top 3 favorite turns: 
#1, #2, #3
Reply

Could we have the game admin rule on the legitimacy of a city deal maybe?
Reply

I think Sullla would be able to competently tar and feather any cheese gifting, and that's sufficient deterrent IMO. Along with a small clause for it in the Do Not Be A Jerk ruleset saying "Don't do cheesy gifting".
Reply

No selling or gifting cities. Simple is best. If you want a city you need to take it via force and war. Removes the controversy around this issue.
Reply



Forum Jump: