Is that character a variant? (I just love getting asked that in channel.) - Charis
Create an account  
Realms Beyond Forum     Gaming     Civ Game Reporting     Completed Games     Completed Civ 4 Pitboss     Pitboss2     RBP2 Lurker Discussion Thread - No Players!

 
RBP2 Lurker Discussion Thread - No Players!

#461
December 21st, 2009, 15:13
dazedroyalty Offline
Member
Posts: 2,585
Threads: 43
Joined: Apr 2008
It seems that Jowy is basically decided to throw his lot in with the Ottomans which means Byz and Spulla are both enemies. I think his major mistake has been how obvious his messages have been lately about his feelings. Spulla are clearly tipped off.
Find
Reply

#462
December 21st, 2009, 15:27
novice Offline
Fighter
Posts: 13,563
Threads: 49
Joined: Oct 2009
MWIN Wrote:But he needs Iron for swords. Copper can't do it.
This has confused me for some time, but I've been to lazy to check on it: Didn't Jowy say earlier in his thread that he has two sources of iron? Is only one of them settled/connected yet?
Find
Reply

#463
December 21st, 2009, 19:10
antisocialmunky Offline
still the worst player to win a pitboss
Posts: 4,443
Threads: 45
Joined: Nov 2009
I loved how Spearker pretty much caught it at pretty much the earliest possible moment. Though I don't think they are expecting a coordinated push between Dantski + Jowy quite yet. They are suspicious of both so I don't think they'll be surprised at all...
Find
Reply

#464
December 21st, 2009, 19:27
Shoot the Moon Offline
Member
Posts: 2,788
Threads: 10
Joined: Oct 2009
antisocialmunky Wrote:I loved how Spearker pretty much caught it at pretty much the earliest possible moment. Though I don't think they are expecting a coordinated push between Dantski + Jowy quite yet. They are suspicious of both so I don't think they'll be surprised at all...

I think they'll get suspicious once Dantski doesn't renew his NAP with them (it's to turn 90 currently, right?). They sure sniffed that out with Jowy.
Find
Reply

#465
December 21st, 2009, 19:34
antisocialmunky Offline
still the worst player to win a pitboss
Posts: 4,443
Threads: 45
Joined: Nov 2009
He should just make the NAP and break it. I think people will understand when its two weaker civs attacking the favorite to win the game civ.
Find
Reply

#466
December 21st, 2009, 19:37
Shoot the Moon Offline
Member
Posts: 2,788
Threads: 10
Joined: Oct 2009
antisocialmunky Wrote:He should just make the NAP and break it. I think people will understand when its two weaker civs attacking the favorite to win the game civ.

I don't think so. I don't think anyone would trust him again, even in future games. If people don't trust regororrarr from being gamey with the rules, I doubt anyone would trust Dantski after he breaks an NAP.
Find
Reply

#467
December 22nd, 2009, 05:16
BobRoberts Offline
Member
Posts: 254
Threads: 2
Joined: Oct 2009
I'm inclined to agree, NAPstabbing seems to go over poorly...
Find
Reply

#468
December 22nd, 2009, 13:18
novice Offline
Fighter
Posts: 13,563
Threads: 49
Joined: Oct 2009
Bit of a blunder there by Byzantium, thinking that the Ottomans researched Iron Working. They should have been able to disprove that option by checking the tile yield of the iron outside Endor/Paris. It should be a nasty surprise for them when the Ottomans turn up with Horse Archers instead of swordsmen... It looks like their settler may finish too late.
Find
Reply

#469
December 22nd, 2009, 13:22
shadyforce Offline
Regular User
Posts: 514
Threads: 2
Joined: Aug 2006
Still though, it is an email that should have been sent a long time ago.
Find
Reply

#470
December 22nd, 2009, 13:24
novice Offline
Fighter
Posts: 13,563
Threads: 49
Joined: Oct 2009
I agree completely. But given the attitude displayed in Kathlete's thread, I doubt it would have made any difference.
Find
Reply



Forum Jump: