Posts: 7,916
Threads: 158
Joined: Jan 2012
(June 16th, 2015, 12:27)Krill Wrote: For the expanded diplomacy, what were the thoughts again? basically creating so many set requests and responses that could be emailed to another player once per turn?
Speaking of, have I asked you yet somewhere if you can code in more options to the trade window?
That would be perfect for this purpose, especially since non-binding is ok, as long as i's in the same interface.
Posts: 23,441
Threads: 132
Joined: Jun 2009
I couldn't code it; the diplomacy XML is bizarre. If I knew how I'd have no problem with it as a game option.
Current games (All): RtR: PB80 Civ 6: PBEM23
Ended games (Selection): BTS games: PB1, PB3, PBEM2, PBEM4, PBEM5B, PBEM50. RB mod games: PB5, PB15, PB27, PB37, PB42, PB46, PB71. FFH games: PBEMVII, PBEMXII. Civ 6: PBEM22 Games ded lurked: PB18
Bobchillingworth
Unregistered
If you are unable to get enough players for a pitboss, I would be interested in participating (only) as part of a PBEM. Of course that may be too far deviated from what you're looking for. My internet situation is not currently ideal, but it should be clear by the time something gets rolling.
Posts: 6,249
Threads: 17
Joined: Jul 2014
I like this idea ! Although my presence makes this look like a PB23 rematch 
Posts: 1,183
Threads: 11
Joined: Aug 2014
(June 16th, 2015, 17:48)AdrienIer Wrote: I like this idea ! Although my presence makes this look like a PB23 rematch
Is that a signup? 
Posts: 7,632
Threads: 36
Joined: Jan 2006
Hmmm, if we're combining, I come over to this as long as it's not Full diplo (don't have time for that), but expanded using Trade Window should be fine.
Posts: 6,249
Threads: 17
Joined: Jul 2014
(June 17th, 2015, 09:36)Grimace Wrote: (June 16th, 2015, 17:48)AdrienIer Wrote: I like this idea ! Although my presence makes this look like a PB23 rematch
Is that a signup? Yes. Maybe. Probably
Posts: 1,183
Threads: 11
Joined: Aug 2014
(June 17th, 2015, 09:56)Dreylin Wrote: Hmmm, if we're combining, I come over to this as long as it's not Full diplo (don't have time for that), but expanded using Trade Window should be fine.
I think the expanded diplo is the best starting point. We can see how that works, because probably none of us have time for full diplo. 
Posts: 12,510
Threads: 61
Joined: Oct 2010
I'm interested in joining this. But I'm about to leave on vacation, won't be back online til July. So I'll put my name down as a tentative, if you're still recruiting when I return.
EitB 25 - Perpentach
Occasional mapmaker
Posts: 4,783
Threads: 21
Joined: Nov 2009
Yeah, I don't got time for that. We will have to come to a consensus on what all the necessary and acceptable diplomacy statements are. And hope that the chat window doesn't eat too many messages.
I also think we'll just have to operate on an honor system when it comes to any non-enforceable deals, like "I'll pay you 1000 gold to declare war on PlayerX."
I'm just doing my best out here.
|
