Posts: 23,600
Threads: 134
Joined: Jun 2009
(July 27th, 2015, 11:49)Jowy Wrote: 
This deal was sent to show interest in taking down Mardoc in the future with Fenn. I'll be sending a few more deals to make sure the message is received and understood.
WTF, they can add a timer on those deals? That's fucking bullshit.
Current games (All): RtR: PB80 Civ 6: PBEM23
Ended games (Selection): BTS games: PB1, PB3, PBEM2, PBEM4, PBEM5B, PBEM50. RB mod games: PB5, PB15, PB27, PB37, PB42, PB46, PB71. FFH games: PBEMVII, PBEMXII. Civ 6: PBEM22 Games ded lurked: PB18
Posts: 1,718
Threads: 4
Joined: Apr 2012
(July 27th, 2015, 17:12)Krill Wrote: (July 27th, 2015, 11:49)Jowy Wrote:
This deal was sent to show interest in taking down Mardoc in the future with Fenn. I'll be sending a few more deals to make sure the message is received and understood.
WTF, they can add a timer on those deals? That's fucking bullshit.
Should the question be put in the tech thread? Let the players decide, maybe? 
Posts: 3,905
Threads: 26
Joined: Apr 2013
They have the rules in first post of the thread.
Quote:All of these include an optional "in X turns"
Posts: 4,657
Threads: 33
Joined: May 2014
It's not different from what is done all the time with gold counters anyways?
Posts: 18,045
Threads: 164
Joined: May 2011
I doubt such extreme lengths of time were intended, but it's how the rule got rote.
I wouldn't have made the map like this if I'd realized the implications of their semi-diplo.
Posts: 5,455
Threads: 18
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 23,600
Threads: 134
Joined: Jun 2009
That is fucking bullshit. All the downsides of full diplomacy with no opportunity to abuse people.
Current games (All): RtR: PB80 Civ 6: PBEM23
Ended games (Selection): BTS games: PB1, PB3, PBEM2, PBEM4, PBEM5B, PBEM50. RB mod games: PB5, PB15, PB27, PB37, PB42, PB46, PB71. FFH games: PBEMVII, PBEMXII. Civ 6: PBEM22 Games ded lurked: PB18
Posts: 23,600
Threads: 134
Joined: Jun 2009
Any fucker tries to implement a rule like that in a game I'm playing, I'm going to find where you live and spend a long time working you over with a hatchet and blowtorch.
Current games (All): RtR: PB80 Civ 6: PBEM23
Ended games (Selection): BTS games: PB1, PB3, PBEM2, PBEM4, PBEM5B, PBEM50. RB mod games: PB5, PB15, PB27, PB37, PB42, PB46, PB71. FFH games: PBEMVII, PBEMXII. Civ 6: PBEM22 Games ded lurked: PB18
Posts: 3,905
Threads: 26
Joined: Apr 2013
Quote:All the downsides of full diplomacy
I think the idea is to get rid of the two biggest downsides;
-time investment
-NAPs
July 28th, 2015, 15:35
(This post was last modified: July 28th, 2015, 15:35 by Krill.)
Posts: 23,600
Threads: 134
Joined: Jun 2009
Fuck does it get rid of NAPs. An accepted deal, 80 turns into the future to attack a third party, is a de facto NAP between the two signing parties.
Current games (All): RtR: PB80 Civ 6: PBEM23
Ended games (Selection): BTS games: PB1, PB3, PBEM2, PBEM4, PBEM5B, PBEM50. RB mod games: PB5, PB15, PB27, PB37, PB42, PB46, PB71. FFH games: PBEMVII, PBEMXII. Civ 6: PBEM22 Games ded lurked: PB18
|
