Also this thread should be moved to the subforum
PB27 Signup Thread
|
(July 24th, 2015, 12:37)Ichabod Wrote: I think sign-ups stand as follow as of now: Is this the most recent list? I need something definite before I can give you all combos....
oh - I guess I'm still signed up for this. Sure, what the heck. I managed to finish top 10 in the other game, based entirely on the not being near krill, I'm sure.
Completed: PBEM 34g (W), 36 , 35 , 5o, 34s, 5p, 42, 48 and PB 9, 18, 27, 57
Current: PB 52. Boudicca of Maya
Recount: I think sign-ups stand as follow as of now:
* = confirmed interest
So that's 23 confirmed, would like a decision from the elements of the OldFinHarryTours group if they'd be up for this game or not.
Rule suggestions:
* No free gifting/selling of cities, Great Persons or units * No active diplomacy of any kind. Only trading. I.e. Don't send any coded messages or try to intrepret them. I could actually try to code a new setting "No city trading" that could remove the city listing from the diplo window. (August 10th, 2015, 22:00)BRickAstley Wrote: So that's 23 confirmed, would like a decision from the elements of the OldFinHarryTours group if they'd be up for this game or not. At least personally I would need to wait for PB18 to finish before deciding. I don't know if OH would be willing to play solo in any case? Have/will you Brick be(en) responsible for randoming starts and combos? After the latest revelations of PB18 I'm afraid of GJ continuing his personal vendetta and prospect of committing for a long game that is directly designed for us to have a bad time is pretty discouraging.
Why not selling units? Was there any problem with this ever?
Also, coding "No city trading" option seems like a good idea. (August 11th, 2015, 00:02)plako Wrote: Rule suggestions: How does people feel about this? Personally I'd be up for not having any cities in the trade screen at least and no sums of gold to be interpreted as certain turns. However, I'd like it to be a clear decision on what's allowed, as people bending the rules otherwise would gain a clear benefit. I guess we could allow (unnecessary) health for health or metal for metal to signal friendship or alliances (but not certain cities!) simply because it could be hard to draw the line on when such a deal is no longer motivated, but if people want to cut that as well, it's definitely fine by me.
Played in PB27
|