Bobchillingworth
Unregistered
(March 14th, 2016, 16:35)NobleHelium Wrote: Path of Exile. I, however, happen to be playing Pillars of Eternity. Doing expansion content at level 4 on PotD... 
Hah, yeah, I've seen you playing it a bit on Steam. Is the expansion worth it if you don't bother with the named companions? I've already played through the game once, and the companion therapy sessions added like five hours to the game which I have no interest in reliving... but they also had personal quests which IIRC added up to a fair amount of exp & content.
March 14th, 2016, 19:52
(This post was last modified: March 15th, 2016, 22:54 by NobleHelium.)
Posts: 13,214
Threads: 25
Joined: Oct 2010
Er well it's kind of hard for me to say whether it's worth $25 since I was a backer. I'd probably wait to get it on a sale at least if you've played the game through already. I'd say there's a decent amount of content with a story about the past (thus similar in vein to the overall theme of the game) but if you're going there with a high level party you'd probably clear most of the content pretty quickly. The harder bosses will be difficult even at max level though as long as you're on Hard difficulty at least.
The new companions are okay, I particularly like the golem even though I don't use her on a regular basis, but their sidequests are pretty short.
Posts: 8,022
Threads: 37
Joined: Jan 2006
Brick, we'll have our list in tomorrow afternoon. Just going to wait for Harry to get a shot at chiming in.
I've got some dirt on my shoulder, can you brush it off for me?
Posts: 13,214
Threads: 25
Joined: Oct 2010
(March 15th, 2016, 22:46)Gaspar Wrote: Brick, we'll have our list in tomorrow afternoon next century. Just going to wait for Harry and his descendants to get a shot at chiming in.
FTFY
Posts: 7,916
Threads: 158
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 13,214
Threads: 25
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 8,022
Threads: 37
Joined: Jan 2006
Here's the leaders everyone got:
REM: Julius Caesar (Imp/Org) of Japan
Scooter: Montezuma (Agg/Spi) of Germany
Pindicator: Boudica (Agg/Chm) of Russia
CH'DZ: Peter (Exp/Phi) of India
Gaspar/Noble: Darius (Fin/Org) of the Dutch
Boldly: Asoka (Spi/Org) of Aztec
Dreylin: Gandhi (Phi/Spi) of the Khmer
More interestingly here's everyone's rankings:
Scooter:
1) Montezuma of Germany
2) Brennus of Vikings
3) Gandhi of Khmer
4) Asoka of Aztecs
5) Peter of India
6) Genghis of America
7) Julius of Japan
Pindicator:
1. Boudica (Agg/Chm) of Russia
2. Montezuma (Agg/Spi) of Germany
3. Brennus (Chm/Spi) of the Vikings
4. Asoka (Spi/Org) of Aztec
5. Gandhi (Phi/Spi) of the Khmer
6. Genghis Khan (Imp/Agg) of the USA
7. Lincoln (Chm/Phi) of the Mongols
Dreylin:
1 Gandhi (Phi/Spi) of the Khmer
2 Asoka (Spi/Org) of Aztec
3 Montezuma (Agg/Spi) of Germany
4 Peter (Exp/Phi) of India
5 Darius (Fin/Org) of the Dutch
6 Boudica (Agg/Chm) of Russia
7 Brennus (Chm/Spi) of the Vikings
CH'DZ
1. Darius (Fin/Org) of the Dutch
2. Peter (Exp/Phi) of India
3. Fredrick (Phi/Org) of the Holy Roman Empire
4. Asoka (Spi/Org) of Aztec
5. Brennus (Chm/Spi) of the Vikings
6. Montezuma (Agg/Spi) of Germany
7. Joao (Imp/Exp) of Carthage
Boldly:
1. Julius Caesar (Imp/Org) of Japan
2. Asoka (Spi/Org) of Aztec
3. Genghis Khan (Imp/Agg) of the USA
4. Joao (Imp/Exp) of Carthage
5. Fredrick (Phi/Org) of the Holy Roman Empire
6. Gandhi (Phi/Spi) of the Khmer
7. Montezuma (Agg/Spi) of Germany
REM:
1 Julius Caesar (Imp/Org) of Japan
2 Genghis Khan (Imp/Agg) of the USA
3 Gandhi (Phi/Spi) of the Khmer
4 Darius (Fin/Org) of the Dutch
5 Montezuma (Agg/Spi) of Germany
6 Asoka (Spi/Org) of Aztec
7 Fredrick (Phi/Org) of the Holy Roman Empire
NobleGaspar:
1 Darius (Fin/Org) of the Dutch
2 Julius Caesar (Imp/Org) of Japan
3 Hammurabi (Agg/Org) of England
4 Joao (Imp/Exp) of Carthage
5 Fredrick (Phi/Org) of the Holy Roman Empire
6 Augustus Caesar (Ind/Imp) of Rome
7 Asoka (Spi/Org) of Aztec
I'll work on getting some analysis up over the next couple days.
I've got some dirt on my shoulder, can you brush it off for me?
Posts: 8,022
Threads: 37
Joined: Jan 2006
I'll get deeper into the analysis when I go opponent by opponent but the main takeway seems to be that opponents valued aggression and spiritual more than we did. The value of spiritual is somewhat obvious but at the end of the day we just felt it paled in comparison to Imperialistic and Organized. I guess the main takeaway is that everyone's picks were pretty interesting and I can't help but feel like maybe we missed something when you compare the full lists.
I've got some dirt on my shoulder, can you brush it off for me?
March 17th, 2016, 20:18
(This post was last modified: March 17th, 2016, 20:18 by NobleHelium.)
Posts: 13,214
Threads: 25
Joined: Oct 2010
God damn it. We're last in the player list which means the trade route logic bug is going to own us. I demand a recount.
Posts: 17,742
Threads: 161
Joined: May 2011
(March 17th, 2016, 20:18)NobleHelium Wrote: God damn it. We're last in the player list which means the trade route logic bug is going to own us. I demand a recount. The pitboss turn order (for trade routes, etc) gets randomly shuffled each turn.
|
