Politics Discussion Thread (Heated Arguing Warning)

[AdrienIer]

If she wanted to get out off her chest as some sort of healing, why did she sleep on this information until now?

The fact that he was nominated for the supreme court reopened the wound, which is why she decided to come forward now. It's pretty simple to explain.

[ipecac]

And btw the case you named before gained over a million dollars from her book although she promissed she will not use the case in her advantage(writing a book) , and she got a lot of television time ,nothing from those would happen if wasnt for the acuzation.

The lunatic Nicolae was also crying for the fired Kapernick football player, about how he lost his job and so on, no mention of how he then signed a multi-million dollar contract with Nike.

They're really good at milking victimhood, 'professional victims' is a most apt term.

[Japper007]

The lunatic Nicolae was also crying for the fired Kapernick football player, about how he lost his job and so on, no mention of how he then signed a multi-million dollar contract with Nike.

They're really good at milking victimhood, 'professional victims' is a most apt term.

You mean as opposed to professional victims like Alex Jones, who made bank and fame out of a nontroversy like being banned from YouTube and Twitter for repeatably violating their Terms of Service? Or a whole bunch of Youtubers who made big time add revenue from whinging about how "SJW's ruined Star Wars/their childhood/ their "vidya", or *insert whatever other trivial neckbeard obsession* " ? Oh and what about the poor, poor people who are victimised because Star Bucks wished them Happy Holidays?

If you want to look at "professional victimhood" you don't have to look across the isle, maybe you shouldn't cast stones you might break a wall in your glass house

[MJW (ya that one)]

Oh, Dr. Ford knew that Brett could be a SC nominee during 2012? It's still over 50% because she would have no way of knowing about #MeToo that makes her attack work. But it does mean that it's totally worthless politically to fold here because there isn't enough differentiation for the masses.


Edit: Her attack was less bad than what she is saying now but that doesn't matter anymore. Brett denied being in contact with her at all so even if she is exaggerating Brett is a dirty liar.

[MJW (ya that one)]

I'm happy that I was always over 50% sure. It's only a matter of time before the GOP is forced to punt it in through. They should have refused to accept Feinstein/DEMs sandbagging because they are going to be forced to punt it in anyway someday. They admitted failure and guilt without getting anything in return.

[MJW (ya that one)]

Well the second women isn't very good but it should be enough to get the job done; especially with that guy who said that he egged Brett on. The unimpressive nature of the second women won't matter.

Edit: It's also in line with Dr. Ford exaggerating Brett but as I said that doesn't matter anymore.

Edit2: Will the DEMs drag things out and then win the Senate to make Trump pick someone like Brain Sandoval? Stay tuned!

[ipecac]

The lunatic Nicolae was also crying for the fired Kapernick football player, about how he lost his job and so on, no mention of how he then signed a multi-million dollar contract with Nike.

They're really good at milking victimhood, 'professional victims' is a most apt term.

You mean as opposed to professional victims like Alex Jones, who made bank and fame out of a nontroversy like being banned from YouTube and Twitter for repeatably violating their Terms of Service? 

I'm pretty sure Jones had already made bank and infamy for acting like a crazy lunatic online before the banning happened, and I haven't heard of him going down the professional victim path afterwards.

Or a whole bunch of Youtubers who made big time add revenue from whinging about how "SJW's ruined Star Wars/their childhood/ their "vidya", or *insert whatever other trivial neckbeard obsession* " ?

Did they claim to be persecuted victims? They just said that new movies suck or something.

Oh and what about the poor, poor people who are victimised because Star Bucks wished them Happy Holidays?

Ditto.

If you want to look at "professional victimhood" you don't have to look across the isle, maybe you shouldn't cast stones you might break a wall in your glass house

Perhaps there are some on the right, but in your haste to distract from the many on the left you failed to identify any. Maybe you'll have better luck next time.

[ipecac]

It's still over 50% because she would have no way of knowing about #MeToo that makes her attack work.

Given how narrow the Clarence Thomas vote was, it would have been a reasonable shot.

[MJW (ya that one)]

It's still over 50% because she would have no way of knowing about #MeToo that makes her attack work.

Given how narrow the Clarence Thomas vote was, it would have been a reasonable shot.

It's totally worthless politically and that's what counts.

[ipecac]

It's still over 50% because she would have no way of knowing about #MeToo that makes her attack work.

Given how narrow the Clarence Thomas vote was, it would have been a reasonable shot.

It's totally worthless politically and that's what counts.

What on earth are you talking about? The previous rape accusation cost Thomas much support during the vote, it would be reasonable to conclude that another one would have a similar effect.