As a French person I feel like it's my duty to explain strikes to you. - AdrienIer

Create an account  

 
PBEM 78 Organizing Thread

Hi there, I am looking to play a CtH (v1.4.4 or any subsequent bugfix release) PBEM.  I much prefer PBEM to avoid any issues with simultaneous turns (especially war-related) and because it means you can always be sure of your builds when they complete at end of turn.  It is the way that the game was designed to be played.  There has not been a Civ4 PBEM in a long time and I hope there is interest among players who have not played such a game.

Most of the newer members will not recognize me, but I played a number of games many years ago before the more recent Civ games came out.  I don't quite remember but I believe I stopped playing since community interest dropped with the release of Civ 5 as well as the fact that the game seemed rather well explored.  With the lapse in time and the changes in the mod, I have interest in playing further games.  In addition, I'm happy to see the new influx of players to the forum and would love to play some games against people I have not played against before.  With that said, I politely ask that the players from the past whom I played against several times and do not wish to play against any further do not join this game; that includes backdooring into the game via dedlurking as well as smurfing or sockpuppetry.

Gaspar will be helping me out with the game although I expect to be playing most of the turns since I have a work from home job and he does not.

We are looking for a game on a balanced, medium to large map (large enough for players to expand and establish a decent empire before having to fight anyone) with a good mix of land and some water.  At first glance, the land shape of PB52 seems good, although I am not sure about the specific distances between the players since I've only read a few posts from pindicator's thread there.  Just to rattle off some of the game settings to be clear:

1) Normal Ancient Start
2) True AI Diplomacy, no usage of the in-game text box or spelling out words with resources
3) No Tech Trading
4) Probably Toroidal map although Cylindrical could be fine if there's a preference for that for whatever reason.  I have no preference for a mirrored or nonmirrored map as long as it is balanced.
5) No huts & no random events
6) Barbarians to be discussed/voted on
7) No inflation modification
8) Normal war weariness (as in not selecting the "No War Weariness" option)

I would also be open to using No Score if there is interest in that.  Probably a snake pick to determine leaders and civs?

PBEMs were traditionally 4-6 players which provides a balance between having a decent number of players and having a good turn pace.

Signups
1) NobleHelium & Gaspar
2) superdeath & GeneralKilCavalry
3) Bobchillingworth
4) Rusten & Hitru
5) Lewwyn
6) Serdoa
Reply

I told you we should have waited longer for scooter to come up with the gofundme.
I've got some dirt on my shoulder, can you brush it off for me?
Reply

Id be down, although ive never played a PBEM so i assume id rather prefer it being a PB... But im not in 6pb's anymore so i might have some extra time on my hands. Sign me up.
"Superdeath seems to have acquired a rep for aggression somehow. [Image: noidea.gif] In this game that's going to help us because he's going to go to the negotiating table with twitchy eyes and slightly too wide a grin and terrify the neighbors into favorable border agreements, one-sided tech deals and staggered NAPs."
-Old Harry. PB48.
Reply

(August 15th, 2020, 18:54)superdeath Wrote: Id be down, although ive never played a PBEM so i assume id rather prefer it being a PB... But im not in 6pb's anymore so i might have some extra time on my hands. Sign me up.

I’ll dedlurk you
"I know that Kilpatrick is a hell of a damned fool, but I want just that sort of man to command my cavalry on this expedition."
- William Tecumseh Sherman

Reply

(August 15th, 2020, 17:53)Gaspar Wrote: I told you we should have waited longer for scooter to come up with the gofundme.

At this rate the money would be better served to pay people to join the game. wink

Please don't take what I said about the timezones too seriously.  I can play the turn during most of my waking hours right now.
Reply

Expressing interest, but I'm going away on holiday end of this week and not sure when I return. If the sign up is still open when I'm back I'll likely want to join and give CtH a try, but feel free to start without me if it fills up.
Reply

When would you want to start? Potentially a sign-up
Suffer Game Sicko
Dodo Tier Player
Reply

Glad to see another CtH game starting. Now how do I get my Tracking to work in a PBEM?  contemplate
Mods: RtR    CtH

Pitboss: PB39, PB40PB52, PB59 Useful Collections: Pickmethods, Mapmaking, Curious Civplayer

Buy me a coffee
Reply

(August 17th, 2020, 11:34)pindicator Wrote: When would you want to start?  Potentially a sign-up

I didn't really have a start date in mind.  We'll still need to discuss the finer points of the settings and we'll need to get a map from somewhere of course.  Do people still use the map scripts that Seven made?  I think it was like Mirrorland and Torusland.
Reply

(August 17th, 2020, 11:38)Charriu Wrote: Glad to see another CtH game starting. Now how do I get my Tracking to work in a PBEM?  contemplate

Not sure what your tracking is, but we used a small PHP script to track the current turnplayer for PBEMs in the past: https://www.realmsbeyond.net/forums/show...p?tid=4632

If you're interested, Ruff may have the latest version of the .php file (originally made by Mist), or if not I can try to dig it up from my archives.
Reply



Forum Jump: