I might dedlurk someone but not sure I have time to commit (we just had our 2nd little tyrant).
Completed: pb38, pb40, pb41, pb42, pb46 and pb49
Playing: pbem78
Playing: pbem78
As a French person I feel like it's my duty to explain strikes to you. - AdrienIer |
PBEM 78 Organizing Thread
|
I might dedlurk someone but not sure I have time to commit (we just had our 2nd little tyrant).
Completed: pb38, pb40, pb41, pb42, pb46 and pb49
Playing: pbem78 (August 17th, 2020, 13:24)NobleHelium Wrote:(August 17th, 2020, 11:38)Charriu Wrote: Glad to see another CtH game starting. Now how do I get my Tracking to work in a PBEM? I'm tracking all kinds of gameplay data (bonus commerce from Financial, bonus reduction from AGGs maintenance etc.). Unfortunately for this tracking I need a centralized element, wish advances the turn. This is easily done via the server in a PB, but in a PBEM I would have to check how to do this.
Mods: RtR CtH
Pitboss: PB39, PB40, PB52, PB59 Useful Collections: Pickmethods, Mapmaking, Curious Civplayer Buy me a coffee (August 17th, 2020, 13:30)Hitru Wrote: I might dedlurk someone but not sure I have time to commit (we just had our 2nd little tyrant). Congratulations. Now you too can enjoy all the advantages of a Diarchy
Mods: RtR CtH
Pitboss: PB39, PB40, PB52, PB59 Useful Collections: Pickmethods, Mapmaking, Curious Civplayer Buy me a coffee
Not a signup (maybe if the map was very small, which it doesn't sound like you want). But we just ran PB50 as a sequential pitboss instead of PBEM. All the benefits of PBEM end-of-turn production and avoiding double move issues, but added ease of turn tracking and notifications from PBSpy, and the ability to log in out-of-turn to take screenshots and tweak micro for the next turn. No score option can eliminate some extra PBSpy info if that is an issue.
(August 17th, 2020, 15:07)Cornflakes Wrote: Not a signup (maybe if the map was very small, which it doesn't sound like you want). But we just ran PB50 as a sequential pitboss instead of PBEM. All the benefits of PBEM end-of-turn production and avoiding double move issues, but added ease of turn tracking and notifications from PBSpy, and the ability to log in out-of-turn to take screenshots and tweak micro for the next turn. No score option can eliminate some extra PBSpy info if that is an issue. THIS.
"Superdeath seems to have acquired a rep for aggression somehow. In this game that's going to help us because he's going to go to the negotiating table with twitchy eyes and slightly too wide a grin and terrify the neighbors into favorable border agreements, one-sided tech deals and staggered NAPs."
-Old Harry. PB48. (August 17th, 2020, 15:07)Cornflakes Wrote: Not a signup (maybe if the map was very small, which it doesn't sound like you want). But we just ran PB50 as a sequential pitboss instead of PBEM. All the benefits of PBEM end-of-turn production and avoiding double move issues, but added ease of turn tracking and notifications from PBSpy, and the ability to log in out-of-turn to take screenshots and tweak micro for the next turn. No score option can eliminate some extra PBSpy info if that is an issue. And my tracking will work with this.
Mods: RtR CtH
Pitboss: PB39, PB40, PB52, PB59 Useful Collections: Pickmethods, Mapmaking, Curious Civplayer Buy me a coffee
We would be open to playing a sequential Pitboss instead of PBEM if more people are willing to join in that case, or if there is a strong preference for it. I had not considered it as a possibility, but we do prefer PBEM because then multiple people can have the turn open at the same time instead of having only one person logged in. Taking screenshots doesn't make a difference since you can always load the previous save to do that. In fact it's probably easier to grab screenshots in a PBEM because you'll always have the previous saves available. PBEM also allows you to check the game situation before deciding on a trade deal. I also have a tendency to keep the game open just to look at things, which is less convenient in a Pitboss.
We used to have an email tracker for turn tracking as mentioned above, not sure if that is still a possibility or not. Remember that there have still been more PBEMs than PBs played so far. I have edited the thread title accordingly.
Civilization IV: 21 (Bismarck of Mali), 29 (Mao Zedong of Babylon), 38 (Isabella of China), 45 (Victoria of Sumeria), PB12 (Darius of Sumeria), 56 (Hammurabi of Sumeria), PB16 (Bismarck of Mali), 78 (Augustus of Byzantium), PB56 (Willem of China)
Hearthstone: ArenaDrafts Profile No longer playing Hearthstone.
Not interested in playing but interested in reading, so I'm posting here for all the people that need viewers to play/keep threads updated
Yeah, I'm not happy about my past behaviour either.
This is an incredibly bad idea given that:
A) I was never very good at BtS B) I'm probably worse at CtH, given that I know almost nothing about the mod C) I haven't played a PBEM in years, and I don't remember if I even played the last to completion But madness has gripped me, and barring having made Noble's Secret Shit List I'd like to sign up. Unless someone else wants to take the slot, in which case by all means do so. I have a vague preference for a PBEM because I've become an old man and inherently distrust anything I haven't tried before (except, apparently, this mod), but would be willing to try Sequential Pitboss as long as it doesn't require me to keep track of timezones and jump through a succession of hoops. |