Posts: 9,706
Threads: 69
Joined: Dec 2010
novice Wrote:I would have loved to be on your team, but that would clearly have been unbalancing, given the puny competition. (Team Seven/Mack in particular)
 Novice trash-talking. This game will be fun.
BTW, can't believe so many people are falling for Krill's pity act. It's obvious a devilish scheme to get you to ded-lurk. When the forum opens and you can't go back, he's gonna rain fire on all of you.
Posts: 8,821
Threads: 75
Joined: Apr 2006
Ilios Wrote:I feel sorry for Krill, so I'll be joining his team.
I thought you told me he was an utter ass and you'd rather be sold by slavers than have anything to do with him?
Darrell
Posts: 23,659
Threads: 134
Joined: Jun 2009
He was sold by slavers...but who do you think bought him?
Current games (All): RtR: PB83
Ended games (Selection): BTS games: PB1, PB3, PBEM2, PBEM4, PBEM5B, PBEM50. RB mod games: PB5, PB15, PB27, PB37, PB42, PB46, PB71 PB80. FFH games: PBEMVII, PBEMXII. Civ 6: PBEM22 PBEM23Games ded lurked: PB18
Posts: 8,022
Threads: 37
Joined: Jan 2006
Ichabod Wrote:When the forum opens and you can't go back, he's gonna rain fire on all of you.
Yeah, I'm counting on this otherwise I'd have joined Team Sissysissynicenice over there. 
I've got some dirt on my shoulder, can you brush it off for me?
Posts: 3,390
Threads: 31
Joined: Dec 2009
darrelljs Wrote:I thought you told me he was an utter ass and you'd rather be sold by slavers than have anything to do with him?
Darrell
Tsk, Darrell, I know you would have preferred my stupendous self to join your team, but seriously, I can't carry you in every game on this site. 
Posts: 2,504
Threads: 29
Joined: Oct 2009
Ilios Wrote:Tsk, Darrell, I know you would have preferred my stupendous self to join your team, but seriously, I can't carry you in every game on this site.
That's why he recruited novice!
Posts: 8,821
Threads: 75
Joined: Apr 2006
Ilios Wrote:Tsk, Darrell, I know you would have preferred my stupendous self to join your team, but seriously, I can't carry you in every game on this site.
Says the guy that had to fight zero Barbarians, build zero Settlers, generate zero gold, and kill zero units :neenernee.
Darrell
Posts: 4,272
Threads: 38
Joined: Jun 2011
For leader/civ picks, how about we do something like PBEM29 and have Commodore come up with 5 relatively balanced pairings - preferably ones that are not picked all that often. The teams then submit preference lists, and they the leader/civs are awarded accordingly.
Posts: 2,504
Threads: 29
Joined: Oct 2009
oledavy Wrote:For leader/civ picks, how about we do something like PBEM29 and have Commodore come up with 5 relatively balanced pairings - preferably ones that are not picked all that often. The teams then submit preference lists, and they the leader/civs are awarded accordingly.
Personally, I hate having others pick for me. We have some strong teams, why not strong picks too?
Yeah, they'll be predictable, but does that really matter?
Posts: 6,457
Threads: 134
Joined: Aug 2004
I much prefer dedicated lurkers only, but scooter's suggestion is a good compromise. Encouraging lurkers to join one team only, but allowing them to lurk all.
HitAnyKey, I don't think it's all that much different but in theory all major decisions are decided on democratically. And all teams are comprised of a higher number of players than usual.
Can we move on with a subforum to discuss the setup and maybe leave a thread here to recruit more players?
|
