Poll: What game type do you prefer to play? You do not have permission to vote in this poll. |
|||
PBEM | 21 | 42.86% | |
Pitboss | 18 | 36.73% | |
Gamespy (I'm a tool) | 2 | 4.08% | |
Banana | 8 | 16.33% | |
Total | 49 vote(s) | 100% |
* You voted for this item. | [Show Results] |
What sort of CIV games do you prefer to play?
|
(January 9th, 2013, 09:28)Viqsi Wrote:(January 8th, 2013, 20:39)Thoth Wrote: TBH: That sounds like more work than simply reading another player's spoiler thread. There are also cases were players fails to put anything useful in spoiler threads. For example 'Team 1' never posted the "fact" that you cannot win by culture with 3 cities from different civs in PB6. They also talked about their invasion plans only after they did them (win they managed to take 1 team 2 city for example).
They mentioned it iirc.
Erebus in the Balance - a FFH Modmod based around balancing and polishing FFH for streamlined competitive play.
Yeah they did mention those things.
Some players are a bit cautious, e.g. Parkin reported wonders after he had built them in PB6? (or whatever the number was..) That is a kind of pity because obviously it is more interesting for lurkers if players post their plans. Then lurkers have a better chance to evaluate whether the player got lucky/unlucky or are the results due to right/wrong decisions. Following the thinking process is also interesting on its own. (January 9th, 2013, 16:10)Fintourist Wrote: Some players are a bit cautious, True. ![]() ![]() Thankfully, it's only happened a few times and AFAIK there hasn't been any Lurker Spoilage in quite a long time. ![]() Quote: That is a kind of pity because obviously it is more interesting for lurkers if players post their plans. Then lurkers have a better chance to evaluate whether the player got lucky/unlucky or are the results due to right/wrong decisions. Following the thinking process is also interesting on its own. Agreed 100%. See Krill's awesome PB5 updates for an example of interesting insights into Empire development. ![]()
fnord
(January 9th, 2013, 09:28)Viqsi Wrote: But what if your opponent doesn't actually update his/her spoiler thread? Then we all all poorer for the lack of updates. ![]() Keeping an up to date Spoiler thread is a lot of work for the player. It takes time and effort. But it's time an effort well rewarded. Both for the community and for the player. I've maintained (sort of ![]() So I see Spoiler threads as win-win: Lurkers get some entertainment and maybe pick up a trick or two and the player focuses better on his game (and has some extra fun as well. Spoiler threads aren't all work. ![]() YMMV ![]()
fnord
Keeping a good thread helps you stay engaged with the game, play better, and attracts lurkers who will point out your mistakes and answer your questions. Discourse with lurkers and teammates can help improve your gameplay a lot.
Civilization IV: 21 (Bismarck of Mali), 29 (Mao Zedong of Babylon), 38 (Isabella of China), 45 (Victoria of Sumeria), PB12 (Darius of Sumeria), 56 (Hammurabi of Sumeria), PB16 (Bismarck of Mali), 78 (Augustus of Byzantium), PB56 (Willem of China)
Hearthstone: ArenaDrafts Profile No longer playing Hearthstone. ![]() (January 9th, 2013, 20:50)NobleHelium Wrote: Keeping a good thread helps you stay engaged with the game, play better, and attracts lurkers who will point out your mistakes and answer your questions. Discourse with lurkers and teammates can help improve your gameplay a lot. That's assuming lurkers actually respond to your spoiler threads in the first place *shifts eyes and whistles nonchalantly*
It also helps to lurk other people's threads so that they get to know you and thus are more likely to read your threads.
![]()
Civilization IV: 21 (Bismarck of Mali), 29 (Mao Zedong of Babylon), 38 (Isabella of China), 45 (Victoria of Sumeria), PB12 (Darius of Sumeria), 56 (Hammurabi of Sumeria), PB16 (Bismarck of Mali), 78 (Augustus of Byzantium), PB56 (Willem of China)
Hearthstone: ArenaDrafts Profile No longer playing Hearthstone. ![]() (January 9th, 2013, 19:33)Thoth Wrote: I've maintained (sort of Oh, likewise. I've only ever done the one (still ongoing), but it's served almost as a primary reference. Not too worried about lurker spoilage; most folks seem to be paying attention to the vets' division anyways. ![]() Am very appreciative of the info and tips I have gotten, tho! Is highly awesome. |