[NO PLAYERS] PBEM58 lurkers and their kindhearted gentle thread
|
Fuck Darius. Fuck the Ottomans. Most boring pairing in the entire game.
Anyone that picks that combo should be banned from the forum.
I feel like AT talks a lot without actually drawing any conclusions. A lot of "this is good, but that is good too" without actually saying whether A is better than B or not.
Civilization IV: 21 (Bismarck of Mali), 29 (Mao Zedong of Babylon), 38 (Isabella of China), 45 (Victoria of Sumeria), PB12 (Darius of Sumeria), 56 (Hammurabi of Sumeria), PB16 (Bismarck of Mali), 78 (Augustus of Byzantium), PB56 (Willem of China)
Hearthstone: ArenaDrafts Profile No longer playing Hearthstone. (January 24th, 2014, 02:18)NobleHelium Wrote: I feel like AT talks a lot without actually drawing any conclusions. A lot of "this is good, but that is good too" without actually saying whether A is better than B or not. So do you think that's better or worse than coming to a conclusion (right or wrong)? You didn't say.
Very funny, Seven. I mean it's worse, yes. I thought my pervasive negative reputation would obviously imply that.
Civilization IV: 21 (Bismarck of Mali), 29 (Mao Zedong of Babylon), 38 (Isabella of China), 45 (Victoria of Sumeria), PB12 (Darius of Sumeria), 56 (Hammurabi of Sumeria), PB16 (Bismarck of Mali), 78 (Augustus of Byzantium), PB56 (Willem of China)
Hearthstone: ArenaDrafts Profile No longer playing Hearthstone.
It did, I just couldn't resist. Personally I find it quite reasonable to not conclude anything if you feel you don't know enough, and I don't mind when people just list pros and cons. I dislike seeing wrong conclusions more.
I don't think you necessarily need to always draw a conclusion, but I rarely see AT draw any at all and the aimlessness hurts his play and leads to half-executed plans that are quickly substituted for others.
Civilization IV: 21 (Bismarck of Mali), 29 (Mao Zedong of Babylon), 38 (Isabella of China), 45 (Victoria of Sumeria), PB12 (Darius of Sumeria), 56 (Hammurabi of Sumeria), PB16 (Bismarck of Mali), 78 (Augustus of Byzantium), PB56 (Willem of China)
Hearthstone: ArenaDrafts Profile No longer playing Hearthstone.
Debating whether to point out CH's massive C&D fail or not...
Civilization IV: 21 (Bismarck of Mali), 29 (Mao Zedong of Babylon), 38 (Isabella of China), 45 (Victoria of Sumeria), PB12 (Darius of Sumeria), 56 (Hammurabi of Sumeria), PB16 (Bismarck of Mali), 78 (Augustus of Byzantium), PB56 (Willem of China)
Hearthstone: ArenaDrafts Profile No longer playing Hearthstone. (January 28th, 2014, 22:54)NobleHelium Wrote: Debating whether to point out CH's massive C&D fail or not... Not sure which thing you're referring to. IMO, explaining mechanics is good. Explaining that probably your opponent did not go masonry first because that would be utterly pointless might be overstepping. |
As a French person I feel like it's my duty to explain strikes to you. - AdrienIer |