regoarrarr Wrote:double post
Since when did you care about double posts?
As a French person I feel like it's my duty to explain strikes to you. - AdrienIer |
RBP4 [SPOILERS] - Shaka of Zulu (sunrise089, regoarrarr, and friends)
|
Krill Wrote:That wasn't a double post, not 50 minutes apart... Mactually..... it was. I posted the chat with SM before I left work. When I got home, it was still showing in the post window like it hadn't post, so I clicked post again and found that it had posted before I left
That sounds a little far-fetched.
Civilization IV: 21 (Bismarck of Mali), 29 (Mao Zedong of Babylon), 38 (Isabella of China), 45 (Victoria of Sumeria), PB12 (Darius of Sumeria), 56 (Hammurabi of Sumeria), PB16 (Bismarck of Mali), 78 (Augustus of Byzantium), PB56 (Willem of China)
Hearthstone: ArenaDrafts Profile No longer playing Hearthstone.
Agreed. We should inflate rego's post count by debating whether the "double post" was actually a ploy to increase his thread's post count.
It was most definitely a ploy, and shame on rego for using such underhanded tactics! The True Spam King knows that he doesn't need to resort to such tricks for true spam success.
And if he thinks such deceptive tactics will somehow work to increase his thread's length... I don't think anybody is going to fall for it.
dtto
Anyway. Congratulation on getting The Great Lighthouse. I am curious how much it will help economicaly. I was never interested in building one in my solo games, but I am not that good, so every lesson in new area is most welcome Dicorion Wrote:dtto Thanks to everyone for the post count inflation ;-). I, for one, deny any such charges I have been meaning to update our sandbox to look at some of the economic effects of founding more cities. I'd done it a bit but I want to make my sandboxs a bit more accurate with distances and such. As I remember though city 3 is a net positive and City 4 is a big positive (of course) but I want to see the effects of the next few cities. |