Yeah, Ruff gave the link to what I was thinking of. Was on phone before, sorry.
Rebalancing Civ4: RtR Mod
|
Plako, the method you are using might actually significantly decrease the amount of random events that occur in game. IIRC, there is a number (might be 1/3) of the total number of events that are discarded immediately ta game start. If half of them are decreased to 0 probability of occurring, and these are the majority of the events that are chosen to actually stay in the game, it should create a glut of the same few events from constantly coming up.
I don't know if that's what is wanted? (February 21st, 2014, 06:08)Krill Wrote: Plako, the method you are using might actually significantly decrease the amount of random events that occur in game. IIRC, there is a number (might be 1/3) of the total number of events that are discarded immediately ta game start. If half of them are decreased to 0 probability of occurring, and these are the majority of the events that are chosen to actually stay in the game, it should create a glut of the same few events from constantly coming up. I've not seen indication about this. Any link where this could have been said. I haven't checked the source code, but I think all events are gone through and RNG-rolled to get the list of active events. (February 21st, 2014, 11:20)plako Wrote:(February 21st, 2014, 06:08)Krill Wrote: Plako, the method you are using might actually significantly decrease the amount of random events that occur in game. IIRC, there is a number (might be 1/3) of the total number of events that are discarded immediately ta game start. If half of them are decreased to 0 probability of occurring, and these are the majority of the events that are chosen to actually stay in the game, it should create a glut of the same few events from constantly coming up. I've seen Sirian say this a few times, and he was the one who coded the events. Each game only contains a certain fraction of the events, so yeah you would have to do some research on if removing those would screw them up or not.
Here's the post I ment:
Quote:But could you explain how the "Active/Weight" ratio works? Quote:I just combined two values to make the list shorter - so no ratio:
Making circumnavigation available to everyone is actually a really good idea. It still gives a bonus to people who scout early, but doesn't make it such a gamebreaking thing for the entire game, because you can always go get it yourself.
mackoti Wrote:SO GAVAGAI WINNED ALOT BUT HE DIDNT HAD ANY PROBLEM?
Circumnavigation is trivial to obtain if you have no time limit, especially given the earliness of map trading. The only time you would have trouble getting it would be in AW games. Giving every ship an extra move affects game balance.
You could just change the other events to iPercentGamesActive = 100. You should probably axe the Horiculture event too though (not sure what the exact name is) because it affects trait balance to give everyone 1-3 free health permanently. Except for the unlucky guy who rolls the 10%.
Civilization IV: 21 (Bismarck of Mali), 29 (Mao Zedong of Babylon), 38 (Isabella of China), 45 (Victoria of Sumeria), PB12 (Darius of Sumeria), 56 (Hammurabi of Sumeria), PB16 (Bismarck of Mali), 78 (Augustus of Byzantium), PB56 (Willem of China)
Hearthstone: ArenaDrafts Profile No longer playing Hearthstone.
I think I would rather remove circumnav than let everybody get it. Having three-move galleys would really change classical era naval war
Suffer Game Sicko
Dodo Tier Player |