[NO PLAYERS] The Kibitzer Klub: PB13 Map & Lurkers

[BaII]

Wouldn't just banning using gold as a number system work out fine?

[Dhalphir]

I think lots of the diplo screen codes are great and fun and I love the intrigue of whether people will figure them oout or not.

But gold as a number system not only circumvents all that but also allows proposal of NAPs.

I agree with BaII - ban Gold use as a number system but allow everything else players have been doing (except city gifting).

Trading horse for horse or fish for fish or whatever is a great thing ot have in the game - it's not precise and explicit like a NAP, just more of a generally friendly message that could still change at any time.

[fluffyflyingpig]

Just have the players agree NO NAPs in the signup? Players can still use the gold as a number system for whatever they want that way but no one should expect a binding NAP out of the numbers.

[Krill]

Need that discussion after this game has ended, and preferably before any more games start.

Also, about no one having a clue about who will win and the various views on the tech costs.

[BRickAstley]

It's very intriguing that the one thing that's stayed most constant in this game is no one thinks they have a chance to win, including all of the frontrunners.

[Bobchillingworth]

If they agree to a draw, they'll have all been right

[darrelljs]

Why did always war fall out of favor?

Darrell

[Krill]

I think people appreciated the option to trade resources. And speaking as a mapmaker AW makes it a bitch to balance resources because you have to get everything right

[SevenSpirits]

I think the main strike against AW is it makes turn splits harder to manage in a pitboss. I love it in PBEMs.

[novice]

Not to mention map trades and open borders, with all that entails.