Posts: 13,563
Threads: 49
Joined: Oct 2009
Axiis Wrote:Have you guys [India] considered getting a catchier name for your power bloc than "non-rebels"? Because you should.
How about the Coalition of the Reluctant?
I have to run.
Posts: 8,244
Threads: 30
Joined: Jun 2004
Kristian95 Wrote:If you refer to how Spullla treat slaze, I think you should remember that slaze himself wasn't really interested in helping Spullla when they were in trouble! On the other hand, I think is Dantski was more active in diplomacy he could get substantially more help from Spullla... at least that is the feel I get from reading Spullla's thread.
I'm more referring about what India would do to help any of their allies. So far all their plans are just take over Jowy for themself and hoping that their 'allies' get in long economie-slowing fights. With that intentions, plans and hopes they are on par with the HRE.
Whosit for example is quite different. His sending of 8 Praets (including the building of several Galleys) was a big investment without any chances to get it back.
But to make it clear both (India & HRE) play it right. If you want to win it's always good to let the other guys do the fighting & dying.
Posts: 8,777
Threads: 75
Joined: Apr 2006
Sulla Wrote:It looks like we'll have roughly 8-10 maces, 8 horse archers, 6 catapults, and some leftover axes and spears when we declare war in about a half-dozen turns.
Enough cats?
Darrell
Posts: 968
Threads: 18
Joined: Apr 2004
Since they won't be any longbow in Jowy's land, I guess the cats might be for bombardment and not attack (it will be a bit slow, but what can Jowy do ?)
Mace should have good (enough) odds vs anything
Posts: 102
Threads: 0
Joined: Feb 2010
Whosit seems to be learning why Spullla considered so much early warring to be suicidal.
Posts: 105
Threads: 3
Joined: Dec 2007
Sullla seems to think that slaze is overreacting to the current threat... do the more experienced lurkers here think that's true? Is slaze in danger of being eliminated/totally crippled, or is he underestimating the power of longbows?
Posts: 23,493
Threads: 132
Joined: Jun 2009
Depending on how many axes the attackers have, I'd rather be defending with swords, and using 2-3 LB in each front city to force the attacker to bomb down the culture. The swords being so much cheaper and just as strong on the whole (ok, 1 less free strike) means that you generally get more kills, as you have more units towards the end of the battle when the opponent has weaker units on defence.
Current games (All): RtR: PB80 Civ 6: PBEM23
Ended games (Selection): BTS games: PB1, PB3, PBEM2, PBEM4, PBEM5B, PBEM50. RB mod games: PB5, PB15, PB27, PB37, PB42, PB46, PB71. FFH games: PBEMVII, PBEMXII. Civ 6: PBEM22 Games ded lurked: PB18
Posts: 297
Threads: 4
Joined: Mar 2010
Axiis Wrote:Sullla seems to think that slaze is overreacting to the current threat... do the more experienced lurkers here think that's true? Is slaze in danger of being eliminated/totally crippled, or is he underestimating the power of longbows?
I think slaze is doomed to lose at least Ollantaytambo the northern front, with that fork on Ollantaytambo and DINA, but who knows?
Hopefully the siege of Ollantaytambo would be able to buy slaze some time to get more cats to that front.
I think his southern front should hold up just fine, though. Unless units are shuffled away to the north.
Posts: 8,244
Threads: 30
Joined: Jun 2004
As long as slaze has no cats he is in danger as Athletes big stack will kill his defenders (at the cost of some cats).
Posts: 7,548
Threads: 63
Joined: Dec 2005
MP veterans correct me if I'm wrong but isn't red significantly better than blue, so as to avoid having to attack Cuzco over the river?
Either way you're going to spend a turn on flatland, so from that perspective they're equal
|